Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: StatesEnemy
F*** LINUX!,it's way OVER HYPED!

I have battled with red hat 7 & 9,also mandrake,best results were with a CD only install of Vector,or Knoppix Linux Boots/Runs from CD

Buy a MAC!

I can see it used if pre installed on Lindows $200 PC,like wal mart sells,for 3d world ctys or just cheap ,simple use but no way is it going to be a threat to Mac or windoze for masses!
!
7 posted on 08/06/2003 8:39:20 AM PDT by wiseone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: wiseone
I'd agree that a Mac is the best way to go. But supporting Linux supports Mac in a back-handed way, given that that OS/X is built upon BSD. :) So you can have your cake and eat it too...
10 posted on 08/06/2003 8:46:53 AM PDT by =Intervention= (White devils for Sharpton Central Florida chapter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: wiseone
"I have battled with red hat 7 & 9,also mandrake..."

Sounds dramatic!

Seriesly, what problems did you have? "Battled with" isn't very specific.

If you are on a Mac, you are likely running OSX, which runs on a Mach kernel, so you might want to refrain from bashing the *nix and Posix family too loud.

13 posted on 08/06/2003 8:50:34 AM PDT by shadowman99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: wiseone
Just out of curiosity, are you an end user, or are you actually in IT, familiar with the myriad of peripheral issues with an OS besides the initial install?

I've been in IT for close to 15 years and I can tell you that many smaller businesses are waiting for this legal mess to be over so they can migrate to Linux when MS finally decides to cut off NT.

There's no way Linux will ever touch the Mac market, but then, the Mac is essentially a niche anyway. I'd disagree that Linux will ever threaten "windoze for the masses". Quite frankly, most home users only use a browser. If it weren't for gaming, Linux would be a perfect choice. Although I'm fond of Win2k, I've found ME to be a disaster and XP to be not much better. Unless MS starts producing some better products or at better prices, a good business argument can be made for switching over to Linux, definitely on the server level, and probably at the workstation level. A lot of the resistance is due to MS's entrenched status in the market - Exchange and SQL servers are two good examples, but for the standard file/print/net access, web servers, etc. Linux is more than competitive on performance and (comparing other new software) very reasonably priced.

You'd likely be surprised at the number of businesses still running NT. When they see the fees MS will charge to force them to upgrade to whatever MS will call the next server OS, a lot of them will give a long hard look at Linux and many will switch. Once its on the servers, the desktops are just a step away. Right now, there's a cost to migrate to any OS and NT is doing just fine. Once MS forces that base to migrate, I predict you'll see a lot of businesses move to Linux.

Just MHO.
17 posted on 08/06/2003 8:58:55 AM PDT by babyface00
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: wiseone
I can see it used if pre installed on Lindows $200 PC,like wal mart sells,for 3d world ctys or just cheap ,simple use but no way is it going to be a threat to Mac or windoze for masses!

That's not the only market for Linux. I'm running a 32-node Linux cluster with parallel DB2, Parallel Batch System, X-CAT, a parallel file system and other high-performance goodies. Try doing any of that with MacOS or Windows.

19 posted on 08/06/2003 10:06:41 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson