To: clamper1797
The essence of my post, and my analysis, is not a condemnation of homosexuality per se. Rather, I've focused on the fact that the liberals in the church have openly chosen to reject Scripture as authoritative, and substituted "reason," meaning whatever they currently think is right or desirable.
A religion that takes such an approach is simply no longer a religion, it is a social, cultural or political movement.
To: governsleastgovernsbest
The essence of my post, and my analysis, is not a condemnation of homosexuality per se. Rather, I've focused on the fact that the liberals in the church have openly chosen to reject Scripture as authoritative, and substituted "reason," meaning whatever they currently think is right or desirable. A religion that takes such an approach is simply no longer a religion, it is a social, cultural or political movement. I absolutely totally completely agree with you
104 posted on
08/05/2003 7:16:15 AM PDT by
clamper1797
(Conservative by nature ... Republican in Spirit ... Patriot by Heart ... and Anti Liberal BY GOD)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson