Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Interviewed by Couric, Pro-Robinson Bishop Says "We Respond to 'Reason,' Not only to Scripture"
The Today Show

Posted on 08/05/2003 4:38:17 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 last
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Some of these outright fools claim that the 'new time' is cause to re-write the Bible AND the Constitution. Beware a fool.
141 posted on 08/06/2003 7:23:11 AM PDT by ApesForEvolution ("The only way evil triumphs is if good men do nothing" E. Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Thank you for adding your thoughtful opinion. I also appreciate the enlightenment by way of the references to Hooker. You have made several good points.
142 posted on 08/09/2003 5:44:31 AM PDT by secret garden (shaking sand from everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: secret garden
Thanks SG. The post did seem to generate a lot of interest and reaction.
143 posted on 08/09/2003 10:48:01 AM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Please accept my apologies, but wasn't the Anglican Church founded in order to break the Church's rules on marriage and sexual morality. That, and stealing Catholic property.
144 posted on 08/09/2003 10:53:00 AM PDT by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
You are absolutely correct. I'm not a Christian, but my parents are Episcopalian and I am familiar w/the church. What is the purpose of having a religion with a Scripture, if you aren't going to abide by it?

And while I, too, prefer reason, give me a break. How in the world does a bishop cast aside Scripture? On what, then, does he base his faith and perhaps the very existence of his church?

145 posted on 08/09/2003 10:59:20 AM PDT by radiohead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #146 Removed by Moderator

To: seamole
Right, b/c the King didn't want to follow the Church's rules on marriage. So it's not surprising that a Church founded on its own sexual morality should slip further over time. BTW: what's the defense for stealing Catholic properties?
147 posted on 08/09/2003 4:13:06 PM PDT by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

Comment #148 Removed by Moderator

To: seamole
I don't think that they paid the Benedictines for their abbeys, or the Franciscans, or the Trappists. Those institutions were'nt "English". And what gave the state the right to suppress the monasteries and convents? Except that they wanted to loot them. As for the Church's, the people put the money into them. THomas Moore and John Fischer found out how the new "English" church would operate; turn the property over to the state, denounce the Roman Catholic Church or be killed. Ugly history. And all over a sexual liason. It's no surprise that a church conceived in that state would come to where they are today w/ gay bishops and gay unions.
149 posted on 08/09/2003 5:41:50 PM PDT by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

Comment #150 Removed by Moderator

To: seamole
Yes, a sexual liason. The Church's rules were one wife per marriage per life; Hank didn't like that, the Pope held to the rule which had governed Catholic life since the start, so he overthrew the Church to please his sexual desires. Much like "Bp" Robinson and his merry supporters. And when he realized how much loot he could take on, well, he couldn't hold himself back. Loot the monasteries he did, even though they weren't his and they weren't "England's" to take. I don't believe the "Anglican Communion" has ever repaid a red cent for their theivery. THere's even a book "The Treasures of Anglican Architecture"; how brazen!
151 posted on 08/10/2003 5:06:02 AM PDT by sobieski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-151 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson