Well, those who believe everything the WP & NYT prints, but don't believe Debka, take note.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: FairOpinion
Might want to send that comment to Rush and Drudge ..
2 posted on
08/04/2003 1:08:34 PM PDT by
Mo1
(Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
To: FairOpinion
Doesn't Drudge siren WP stories all the time, including the original 'Powell will step down' one???
3 posted on
08/04/2003 1:08:35 PM PDT by
rintense
To: FairOpinion
" but don't believe Debka, take note" Yea, What happened to the Debka link on Free Republic ?
4 posted on
08/04/2003 1:09:40 PM PDT by
Tank-FL
(Keep the Faith - GO VMI)
To: FairOpinion; Timesink; Miss Marple
Offical statements awaiting Washington Post retractions *ping*
5 posted on
08/04/2003 1:10:23 PM PDT by
jriemer
(We are a Republic not a Democracy)
To: FairOpinion; Timesink
Sounds like the liberals are just "wishful thinking" in print. Debka, though, is at least interesting--unlike the NYT, Washington Post, NPR and other "acceptable" media sources on FR. And, as you stated, at least as accurate, if not more so.
6 posted on
08/04/2003 1:11:13 PM PDT by
MizSterious
(Support whirled peas!)
To: FairOpinion
A-HA!! I said this yesterday that i doubted the validity of this story from the Post. It sounded to me that the Post was floating hopeful stories in an effort to drive a wedge between Bush and his high black support. I feel vindicated.
To: FairOpinion
I used to hyperventilate when I saw a "hugh and series" story highlighted by Drudge (or for that matter FR). It's gotten to the point that when I put the curser over the link to the story and I see NYT, WP or LA Times I don't even click on anymore. I know the story be 1)captioned with a misleading headline 2) not be news but be commentary 3) not be the truth. Why bother even reading it.
To: FairOpinion
Well, I'm disappointed I might have to suffer another four years of C. Powell toadying up to palestinians, but it's nice to see the Washington Post discredited yet again. When will people sit up and take note that this rag just conjures stories up out of thin air???
Owl_Eagle
Unleash the Hogs of Peace.
P.J. O'Rourke Parliament of Whores
12 posted on
08/04/2003 1:25:11 PM PDT by
End Times Sentinel
("Fire can be our servant, whether it's toasting S'mores or raining down on Charlie"-Pcpl Skinner)
To: FairOpinion
Well, those who believe everything the WP & NYT prints, but don't believe Debka, take note.We know that all three are full of crap. Your point is?
13 posted on
08/04/2003 1:26:11 PM PDT by
dirtboy
(Who's that big cat I saw roaming around here again? I thought he went extinct...)
To: FairOpinion
So, did Jayson Blair find a new job?
14 posted on
08/04/2003 1:27:05 PM PDT by
theDentist
(Liberals can sugarcoat sh** all they want. I'm not biting.)
To: FairOpinion
I believe this is more "planting the seeds of discontent and disension".
To: Admin Moderator
The original FALSE story is still in "Breaking News", that's why I posted this one there, but it was removed.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/957661/posts It just doesn't make sense to have the FALSE story under Breaking news, and the correction down someher, where not everyone may see it.
To: martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; Miss Marple; Tamsey; ...
This is the New York Times Washington Post Schadenfreude Ping List. Freepmail me to be added or dropped.
This is the nascent Mainstream Media Shenanigans ping list. Please freepmail me to be added or dropped.
Please note this will likely become a high-volume list.
Also feel free to ping me if you come across a thread you would think worthy of the ping list. I can't catch them all!
19 posted on
08/04/2003 1:45:51 PM PDT by
Timesink
To: FairOpinion
More electioneering at the fishwrap known as The Washington Post.
21 posted on
08/04/2003 1:51:27 PM PDT by
.cnI redruM
("If you think no one cares about you, try skipping next month's car payment" - Daily Zen)
To: FairOpinion
No one resigns anymore. Such concepts of honor have long been dead in this country. No even one resignation over 9/11! A resignation is seen as a sign of weakness or of a mistake and we can't admit to mistakes now can we? What happens now is called Bureaucratic Marginalization. An offical who either "messed up", was obviously wrong, or is simply incompetent isn't removed or asked to resign- they are simply left in place but without power and denied access to the POTUS or other power centers. They are denied any input into policy making or decisions. They simply become automatic signature machines for the policies of others.
24 posted on
08/04/2003 2:08:08 PM PDT by
Burkeman1
(If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.)
To: FairOpinion
No News is Breaking News?
28 posted on
08/04/2003 2:27:30 PM PDT by
polemikos
(This Space for Rant)
To: FairOpinion
Almost as honest as the dis-info that is spewed from our government.
30 posted on
08/04/2003 2:29:42 PM PDT by
WhiteGuy
(Deficit $455,000,000,000 + MY VOTE IS FOR SALE)
To: FairOpinion
It doesn't matter. If he leaves today or in two years, he will be replaced. Same for all other positions.
31 posted on
08/04/2003 2:30:29 PM PDT by
Consort
To: FairOpinion
But, but, but I saw it on CNN! They would NEVER run something if it wasn't backed up by other sources. Oh the humanity!
32 posted on
08/04/2003 2:31:45 PM PDT by
Nexus
To: FairOpinion; Miss Marple
Armitage was on Hannity this afternoon, and had one word for it.......NONSENSE.
35 posted on
08/04/2003 2:37:14 PM PDT by
ohioWfan
(Have you prayed for your President today?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson