Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ARMORED WARFARE: Gun-Vees Appear in Iraq
StrategyPage.com ^ | August 4, 2003 | Adam Geibel

Posted on 08/04/2003 7:23:28 AM PDT by overtaxed_canadian

August 4, 2003: August 2, 2003: At least two battalions in the 4th Infantry Division have modified their equipment to help them adjust to urban warfare by mounting .50 caliber M2 heavy machine guns on the back of their Humvees. These vehicles are now nicknamed "Gun-Vees" and resemble the "technicals" used by Somali fighters first encountered by Americans in Mogadishu ten years ago.

These up gunned vehicles are especially useful in battling the Islamic fighters in alleys and other tight urban spaces, where tanks and Bradley Fighting Vehicles cannot maneuver. The modified vehicle also provide an element of surprise, being far quieter than the tracked M1 Abrams or M2 Bradley's.


TOPICS: Extended News; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 4thid; gunvees; humvees; iraq; miltech; technicals; urbanwarfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: astounded; AppyPappy

Gun trucks of Viet Nam. The gun-vees bigger older brother.

21 posted on 08/04/2003 8:14:04 AM PDT by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: jriemer
Bored newsies have never seen MP vehicles at Fort Drum that have .50 cals on top.
So to them, it's "new".
22 posted on 08/04/2003 8:21:06 AM PDT by Darksheare ("I didn't say it wouldn't burn, I said it wouldn't hurt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: overtaxed_canadian
The hummer that my son used during his duty in Kuwait had a .50 cal onboard. That was part of his vehicle preps before shipping. When he wasn't doing medical transports, he would stand a watch with the hummer + .50 cal.
23 posted on 08/04/2003 8:24:34 AM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: astounded
There's a slightly armored version of the humvee that is affectionately called a 'herdshell' humvee.
It has supplementary armor, usually kevlar doors hood, and body panels beefed up with the stuff.
Nice vehicles, usually seen with MP units, but I did see one or two with the 42nd Infantry guys at Fort Drum one year during AT.
Not sure what the actual 'issue number' of such humvee variants is, I was only artillery and we never had anything bigger than a 1097 humvee other thna the deuce and 5 ton.
Though we DID have a Hemmet for about two weeks until someone noticed.
24 posted on 08/04/2003 8:25:47 AM PDT by Darksheare ("I didn't say it wouldn't burn, I said it wouldn't hurt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: astounded
7.62 minigun from a Blackhawk or Little Bird mounted on a HumVee would work

Instant Baathist kebab.

25 posted on 08/04/2003 8:34:34 AM PDT by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
they couldn't put the A-10's 30mm GAU-8/A Gatling gun on there, could they? : /
26 posted on 08/04/2003 8:38:13 AM PDT by Lost and Confused (<---- n00b!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: pierrem15
I like the power of the .50 to shred walls in an urban alleyway at a distance. Like Ma Bell says, "Reach out and touch someone."
27 posted on 08/04/2003 8:57:55 AM PDT by wildbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone; hchutch
We need to bring back the 90MM recoilless rifle. Man-portable, but it has a good punch against all but the heaviest urban construction.
28 posted on 08/04/2003 9:01:03 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: overtaxed_canadian
The Rat Patrol returns!!!
29 posted on 08/04/2003 9:15:51 AM PDT by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lost and Confused
put the A-10's 30mm GAU-8/A Gatling gun on there

And a second hum-vee right behind to carry the ammo.

30 posted on 08/04/2003 9:21:51 AM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Agreed.
31 posted on 08/04/2003 9:38:16 AM PDT by hchutch (The National League needs to adopt the designated hitter rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale; Poohbah
How about that self-propelled Vulcan (M163, IIRC) for the job? Why did we ever retire those?
32 posted on 08/04/2003 9:39:15 AM PDT by hchutch (The National League needs to adopt the designated hitter rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Why did we ever retire those?

1960s-vintage electronics. Good luck getting spares.

33 posted on 08/04/2003 9:54:13 AM PDT by Poohbah (Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Yes indeed! (to the 90MM recoiless rifle). Would have been of great benefit in Afghanistan. Are you familiar with the ONTOS? A very nasty looking thing the USMC used in VN.
34 posted on 08/04/2003 9:55:04 AM PDT by donozark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Damn shame. Those things could really cut apart infantry or attack choppers and planes.

Too bad we couldn't re-wire the things...
35 posted on 08/04/2003 10:01:51 AM PDT by hchutch (The National League needs to adopt the designated hitter rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: hchutch; Poohbah
I seem to remember it's light armor being mentioned as a reason for retiring it as well.
36 posted on 08/04/2003 10:04:37 AM PDT by Darksheare ("I didn't say it wouldn't burn, I said it wouldn't hurt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: overtaxed_canadian


How about one of these on the back of a dump truck?
37 posted on 08/04/2003 10:14:25 AM PDT by hemogoblin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donozark; Poohbah
Yes indeed! (to the 90MM recoiless rifle). Would have been of great benefit in Afghanistan. Are you familiar with the ONTOS? A very nasty looking thing the USMC used in VN.


The ONTOS did have six 90MM recoiless rifles, they're manually loaded and don't have near the rate of fire that a battery of M2s would put out. When reloading, the crew is pretty well exposed to side and rear fire.

38 posted on 08/04/2003 10:15:36 AM PDT by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jriemer
That's the beast! Nasty lookin' thing isn't it? Slow rate of fire, but imagine initial round of fire...
39 posted on 08/04/2003 10:18:46 AM PDT by donozark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: donozark
That's the beast! Nasty lookin' thing isn't it? Slow rate of fire, but imagine initial round of fire...

Just hope your shots are on target. It looks like the whole darn thing has to move for targeting adjustments.

40 posted on 08/04/2003 10:27:17 AM PDT by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson