Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Gil4
If it has no value to them, they won't waste their time downloading and listening. If it does have value to them, they need to pay for it.

That makes as much sense as saying that if it has no value to them, they wouldn't bother listening to it on the radio. Look at it this way...I have a lot of CDs I purchased and (legally) downloaded to my computer. Why? Because I could. They sound like what they are on the computer...squeaky disconnected bits. I don't listen to them, not at all.

Sure, maybe these vicious, nasty purloiners of quality sound do listen to it. But, if they do, they're more (not less) likely to become familiar with the performer and buy stuff. They'd be really likely to buy anything that was really good, on high-quality vinyl (producing music in waves, not blips), with all of the things I mentioned. Of course, they'd have to be educated first. This whole thing started because record companies wanted something easier to market and shelf.

The other issue someone brought up is out-of-issue music. The computer is where it is stored and found.

You assume people actually buy or don't buy things as a matter of finances. That's ridiculous in the US today. If people want something badly enough, they'll buy it. I don't here anywhere in your argument that the "music" today is actually worth paying for.

19 posted on 08/04/2003 5:26:45 AM PDT by grania ("Won't get fooled again")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: grania
Fine, I'll restate it. They must have thought it had some value to them at the time they made the decision to download the music, or they wouldn't have downloaded it. The value may have been minimal, but it had value. They need to decide if it is worth buying - if it is, they need to buy it; if it isn't, they need to do without it. If it's not worth buying, it's not worth breaking the law to get it.

We have copyright laws for a reason - people who produce the music deserve to be paid. I don't buy the arguement that the MP3 downloads are great advertising - if the artists want to give away free samples, that's their business. Anybody who take it upon himself to do that for them is stealing from them (stealing their right to copy - copyright) and anyone who downloads illegally copied music is knowingly receiving stolen property.

If you think it's junk, don't buy it. If you want it, buy it.

People do buy things (or decide not to) as a matter of finances. They don't ask "can I afford to buy this CD and still eat," but they ask "is it worth $x to buy that, or would my money be better spent elsewhere. People do buy music today, so it must be worth paying for. Apparently it's not worth it to you, and I buy very little, so most of it is not worth it to me, but it is worth it to some people. And there are a lot of people who are content with the quality of the MP3 files, and many of them do record them to CD and avoid buying the music as a result.

I'm not a fan of the music industry or the way the RIAA does business in general, but they are right on this issue. I'm not crazy about the way McD's does business, either, and their food is junk, but I don't think that entitles me to free hamburgers.

27 posted on 08/04/2003 6:34:28 AM PDT by Gil4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson