Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"What Will George Bush Do About North Korea? How to win without really trying"
MensNewsDaily.com ^ | 04AUG02 | Tom Adkins

Posted on 08/03/2003 5:59:24 PM PDT by familyop

What Will George Bush Do About North Korea? How to win without really trying

August 4, 2002 by Tom Adkins

Now that Iraq has been somewhat tamed with a swift and decisive campaign against Saddam Hussein, the United States is in the middle of a complex nation-building process. During the past 18 months, however, the Bush administration handled another, possibly greater threat with amazing diplomatic maneuver. Yet few recognize the victory. Let's look at the Korean Crisis as it simmers on our back burner.

Early in the Bush Presidency, the Korean peninsula was so quiet that South Korea asked us to consider removing our troops. But when 9/11 signaled the start of a long war against terrorism, President Bush pointed out North Korean dictator Kim Il Sung was part of the "Axis of Evil." Kim took the bait and showed his hand. Believing America was vulnerable, Kim revealed he had duped Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter, admitting a nuclear weapons program. Now, he threatened to use nukes to stop American "hostile policies," fend off South Korean threats, and take on the evil Japanese. It wasn't a bad gamble. The last time North Korea rattled the nuclear saber, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter capitulated like frightened Cub Scouts listening to scary campfire stories. Clinton gave North Korea free oil, food and light water nuclear technology in exchange for a promise to stop playing with nuclear toys. Kim agreed, a bargain any fool knew he'd never keep. This time, Kim threatened all sorts of trouble. And after 9/11, George Bush was in a theoretically weakened position.

But Bush has performed a master stroke. Recognizing a nuclear loose cannon in North Korea is a far greater threat to China than the United States, Bush simply ignored Kim. This warned all surrounding nations: they had a direct stake in the outcome. Suddenly, South Korea asked us to stick around. Japan is now seriously considering a nuclear defense. And the last thing China wants is a greater American presence, a better armed North Korea, and six nuclear neighbors (Russia, Pakistan, India, North Korea, South Korea, Japan). The more nukes in the neighborhood, the less valuable China's Loral-guided fleet of ICBMs, which protects its Pacific expansionist designs, becomes.

China, supplying energy and food to North Korea's failed communist economy, is in a unique position to rope in their crazed ally. Wisely, they waited to observe Bush in action. But this week, after our decisive victory and Bush's firm commitment in Iraq, China took the reins in the Korean discussions, essentially telling Kim to knock it off. At that moment, George Bush had his brilliant diplomatic victory.

By doing absolutely nothing, the burden of keeping Kim in line defaults to China in perpetuity, and rallies our friends. North Korea began by threatening the United States, but Bush maneuvered China into the dirty work and made them pay the price. Diplomacy doesn't get any sweeter than that. And there's another benefit: As China grudgingly pays Kim's debts, they admit communist failure while the whole world watches.

And what sweet revenge! On the 50th anniversary of the divided stalemate created when a million Chinese troops crossed the Yalu River, George Bush has hung the massive North Korean stone around China's neck, the last-place ribbon in a high-stakes gamble.

It all goes back to President Bush's decisive military action and commitment to victory. Funny…Bush set the war dogs on Saddam Hussein, and the world's bad guys suddenly became "cooperative." Syria kicked out Uday Hussein. Iran got more enthusiastic about getting inspected. Al Qaeda is still homeless. Saif al-eslam Gadhafi (Moammar's son) asked the United States to bury the hatchet with Libya. And after Uday and Qusay got their 50-caliber enema, China kicked Kim Il Sung back into the doghouse.

North Korea played the same trick on two presidents. Clinton had far better position and lost. Despite much worse position, Bush gained diplomatic advantage. This proves fighting wisely from a modest position can bring more success than capitulating from a strong position. As Sun Tzu noted, "To subdue the enemy without fighting is the supreme excellence. The victories won by a master of war gain him neither reputation for wisdom nor merit for courage." Of course, the pundit class appeasers are behind the curve, still wondering what George Bush intends to do about North Korea. They can't comprehend victory without a big photo-op signing ceremony with flags, papers and pens flying about. Meanwhile, the battle has been won, without a shot.

Like Reagan, Bush will receive no credit for a brilliant victory nobody recognizes. But then again, they rarely do.

Tom Adkins

Tom Adkins is the executive publisher of CommonConservative.com


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bush; charlie; china; iran; iraq; korea; north; northkorea; president; reagan; security; south; strategy; sun; syria; terror; tzu; victory; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Go, Mr. President! And good work, Tom!
1 posted on 08/03/2003 5:59:24 PM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: familyop
We here at the Freep recognized what President Bush was doing way back when it started. Anyone who has studied how Bush works could see it. It was bold, it was innovative, and it worked.
2 posted on 08/03/2003 6:06:49 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonathon Spectre; Symbiant
Madman: Reconsidered
3 posted on 08/03/2003 6:09:17 PM PDT by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop; ohioWfan; rintense; Grampa Dave; Miss Marple; Mo1; kayak; mystery-ak
Excellent article, Thanks for posting it

Pinging some frineds

4 posted on 08/03/2003 6:17:13 PM PDT by MJY1288 (The Enemies of America can Count on the Democrats for Aid and Comfort)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Thanks for the ping, Mike! Excellent artiicle, and spot on!

I note that the agreement by North Korea to multilateral talks was passed over due to the continuing flap over uranium, but we are making great progress there and the President should be congratulated.

Just once, I wish someone in the mainstram media would at least agree that he is NOT stupid...but then again, I wish I would win the Lotto, as well.

5 posted on 08/03/2003 6:36:53 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Yea but... The longer they keep calling him stupid the more he makes them look like fools. How can they possibly explain why they keep getting their clocks cleaned by someone they consider stupid?
6 posted on 08/03/2003 6:39:08 PM PDT by MJY1288 (The Enemies of America can Count on the Democrats for Aid and Comfort)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
The last time North Korea rattled the nuclear saber, Bill Clinton and Jimmy Carter capitulated like frightened Cub Scouts listening to scary campfire stories. Clinton gave North Korea free oil, food and light water nuclear technology in exchange for a promise to stop playing with nuclear toys.

Excellent article .. I just have one disagreement .. IMO Carter and Clinton weren't frightened .. Carter knew exactly what he was doing

7 posted on 08/03/2003 6:41:22 PM PDT by Mo1 (Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: familyop
But Bush has performed a master stroke. Recognizing a nuclear loose cannon in North Korea is a far greater threat to China than the United States, Bush simply ignored Kim.

When you think about it this was the only answer. The DPRK was China's problem and now that China is becoming an economic power Money trumps Ideology.

8 posted on 08/03/2003 6:42:30 PM PDT by Mike Darancette (RATS: We're sorry Saddam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Thanks for the ping...excellent read and never any doubts of our President and his team.
9 posted on 08/03/2003 6:42:34 PM PDT by mystery-ak (The War is not over for me until my hubby's boots hit U.S. soil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple; section9; Poohbah
And, of course, there is the fact that Japan and Taiwan probably are already working on nukes.

At least, I would be working on nukes in their position.
10 posted on 08/03/2003 7:09:52 PM PDT by hchutch (The National League needs to adopt the designated hitter rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
"Excellent article, Thanks for posting it."

...my pleasure!

Yes, we do get noisy, sometimes, to get what we want when
windows of opportunity/urgency come along, but I haven't
doubted the President's tactical expertise (and his team's)
for one day. And he's a man of courage. Hooah.
11 posted on 08/03/2003 7:12:10 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: Gunslingr3

A Madman in Full, by Tom Wolfe.

Be Seeing You,

Chris

13 posted on 08/03/2003 7:45:13 PM PDT by section9 (Major Kusanagi is back from vacation, ready to kick the liberal ass....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: STANDUPANDFITE; Poohbah; dighton; Chancellor Palpatine
TURKEY TROTS ON WATER RR WHERE IS THE ZOT RR THE WORLD WONDERS
14 posted on 08/03/2003 7:51:17 PM PDT by hchutch (The National League needs to adopt the designated hitter rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: section9
I prefer "Chia Pet" myself.

Man, that guy messed it up for the ChiComs. Japan now is working on a couple of carriers, I hear.
15 posted on 08/03/2003 7:52:28 PM PDT by hchutch (The National League needs to adopt the designated hitter rule.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: STANDUPANDFITE
Sweetie, I don't suppose you have noticed but Bush doesn't have any sons, only daughters.

And Iraq was an easy target? Tell that one to Iran and Kuwait.

China thought they could attack us through North Korea. They blew it big time. Now they not only have to reign them in but they have to keep them from falling apart.

Why should we do anything? With this stupid move they just got their worse nightmare. A re-militarized Japan, a South Korea asking us to stay, Taiwan waking up and then the little nut case decided to threaten Australia. Not exactly the outcome China wanted.

16 posted on 08/03/2003 8:07:59 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Under advice from my lawyer I will now be known as Mostly Harmless Teddy Bear)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: familyop
This article is from "MensNewsDaily.com"?

Hmmm...

17 posted on 08/03/2003 8:21:34 PM PDT by UnBlinkingEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STANDUPANDFITE
Your intellectual kneejerkism that going to war solves everything is so quaint, but it exposes you to just ridicule.

Keep it up if you want.

If we must take on NK militarily, we will do so. Right now, we are dealing with another matter in the middle east tryint to change the situation there.
18 posted on 08/03/2003 8:28:25 PM PDT by rwfromkansas (http://www.collegemedianews.com *some interesting radio news reports here; check it out*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: familyop
Like Reagan, Bush will receive no credit for a brilliant victory nobody recognizes. But then again, they rarely do.

Reagan and Dubya' are a rare breed and request no recognition for a job well done. Some ex's strive for recognition even when it is not deserved of them.

This is a great posting for the labelers of "Bushbots" to read and contemplate.

19 posted on 08/03/2003 8:32:40 PM PDT by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnBlinkingEye
"This article is from "MensNewsDaily.com"?
Hmmm..."

And...? ...point is?
20 posted on 08/03/2003 8:40:14 PM PDT by familyop (Essayons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson