Actually you are way behind everyone else and you just managed to poop all over someone else's thread with a lotta claptrap and respin.
----
Here's your post that started it:
To: ALS
Impressive work and sure to change the face of science forever! <-- YOU quoting my compliment to betty boop
Your confidence in new-agey suppositions is awe-inspiring.
If you like that one there are at least a hundred more like it in any New Age "library", including variations pinning their imaginations on crystals, photons, quantum fields, ghosts, karma, Universal spirit, chakras, chi, psi, Akashic record, magick, archetypes, the stars, auras, etc.
So far, they've all been remarkably unsuccessful at "changing the face of science forever".
12 posted on 08/02/2003 7:46 PM CDT by Ichneumon
----
It was a smarmy swipe at both me and the creator of this thread and I suspect the intent was to turn it into a tinfoil thread in hopes those that followed you would pick up your lead and post more tinfoil cracks.
This is serious science, son. With serious players and a high potential for serious consequences for the rest of science, and that's probably what is bothering you.
You can learn more about this new science here:
http://designeduniverse.com/bb/integrativescience Now back to betty boop's topic with ya!
Oh, and remember, lotsa wordy re-spins don't make ya right. Just read Hillary's book.
Actually you are way behind everyone else and you just managed to poop all over someone else's thread with a lotta claptrap and respin. I'll let that speak for itself... And for you.
I suspect the intent was to turn it into a tinfoil thread in hopes those that followed you would pick up your lead and post more tinfoil cracks.
As is often the case, you suspect wrongly.
This is serious science, son.
Oh? Where, exactly? Make sure you know what things mean before you use them in sentences.
With serious players and a high potential for serious consequences for the rest of science, and that's probably what is bothering you.
Again, you've got a really poor track record when it comes to making presumptions about me. Your accusations reveal a lot more about your own proclivities than they do about mine.
And for reasons I've already outlined, I don't feel there is any good support for your optimistic (perhaps a better word would be "eager") feelings about the "high potential" for this sort of thing to make even a ripple in the scientific world, much less "serious consequences".
Oh, and remember, lotsa wordy re-spins don't make ya right.
Believe me, your posts are almost always excellent reminders of that point. Just not quite in the way you intended.