300 years ago, Jews were in Ghettos (not the kind with rap music and drugs but walled areas in cities where the inhabitants were REQUIRED (that is HAD) to live in Western Europe (Rothschild and sons was started in a German ghetto btw). They had as much influence in England pre Napoleon as a migrant worker (white since that appears to be your preference) has today. The Napoleonic wars did change things as did a wastrel prince in England to a point. And Jews saved the founding father's hineys at the expense of their families (Haym Solomon died a pauper) and lives. And this was and is for the most part (you and your Jooo fearing pals excepted) a religiously neutral nation. We have no state church and don't need the headaches involved.
One reason you don't read about these folks doing charitable works is because bragging about charities is considered ungodly. The highest form of charity is to give anonymously for a religious Jew. The descendents of the men you mention are like all the rest of the parasitical born rich folks: they had everything handed to them and are Kennedy like in their morals and actions. Unless you want to ascribe some "other motive" to this, it is obvious to thinking people that you have issues with Jews. Try getting to know a few sometime.
You continue to reference Eustace in overtones that indicate he is a racist when I have explained to you, and he has explained to you that those are not his feelings. In so doing, you risk painting yourself with the same type of stripe you continue to cast at him...one of unfounded and unreasoned bias towards others.
I have stated my own feelings about the topic you rasie and are discussing with Eustace on several occassions on this thread.
There are people and organizations of many ilks wanting to destroy our freedom. They are all our enemies. It is not wise (IMHO) to be politically neutral (which in my mind is just another word for politically correct) when addressing them. One is not a racist for so doing. One is a racist as a result of their heart felt feelings about another race and how they act with respect to members of that race. In order to determine that, you would have to know a whole lot more about a person than what has been stated on this thread.
One last time regarding Eustace...as I said, I know him and his family personally...he is not, and they are not racist.
This thread is about the current practise of free trade and its impact on the free market. I would appreciate it, if you would like to continue the discussion regarding your impressions of Zionism and the Rothchilds with Eustace, that you both would take it to another separate thread, or take it to private Fremail.
That's just my preference at this point as the originator of the thread...at this point, that discussion is not adding to the point or intent of the thread.
Thanks and Fregards.