Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA's Ion Engine Runs for Nearly 5 Years: No Problems
spaceref.com ^ | 31 Jul 03 | staff

Posted on 07/31/2003 8:55:12 AM PDT by RightWhale

NASA's Ion Engine Runs for Nearly 5 Years: No Problems

The future is here for spacecraft propulsion and the trouble-free engine performance that every vehicle operator would like to see, achieved by an ion engine running for a record 30,352 hours at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. The engine is a spare of the Deep Space 1 ion engine used during a successful technology demonstration mission that featured a bonus visit to comet Borrelly. It had a design life of 8,000 hours, but researchers kept it running for almost 5 years -- from Oct. 5, 1998, to June 26, 2003 -- in a rare opportunity to fully observe its performance and wear at different power levels throughout the test. This information is vital to future missions that will use ion propulsion, as well as to current research efforts to develop improved ion thrusters.

"Finding new means to explore our solar system -- rapidly, safely and with the highest possible return on investment -- is a key NASA mission," said Colleen Hartman, head of Solar System Exploration at NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C. "Robust in-space flight technologies such as ion propulsion are critical to this effort and will pioneer a new generation of discovery among our neighboring worlds." While the engine had not yet reached the end of its life, the decision was made to terminate the test because near-term NASA missions using ion propulsion needed analysis data that required inspection of the different engine components. In particular, the inspection of the thruster's discharge chamber, where xenon gas is ionized, is critical for mission designers of the upcoming Dawn mission. Dawn, part of NASA's Discovery Program, will be launched in 2006 to orbit Vesta and Ceres, two of the largest asteroids in the solar system.

"The chamber was in good condition," said John Brophy, JPL's project element manager for the Dawn ion propulsion system. "Most of the components showed wear, but nothing that would have caused near-term failure."

Marc Rayman, former Deep Space 1 project manager, said, "There are many exciting missions into the solar system that would be unaffordable or truly impossible without ion propulsion. This remarkable test shows that the thrusters have the staying power for long duration missions." Ion engines use xenon, the same gas used in photo flash tubes, plasma televisions and some automobile headlights. Deep Space 1 featured the first use of an ion engine as the primary method of propulsion on a NASA spacecraft. That engine was operated for 16,265 hours, the record for operating any propulsion system in space. Ion propulsion systems can be very lightweight, because they can run on just a few grams of xenon gas a day. While the thrust exerted by the engine is quite gentle, its fuel efficiency can reduce trip times and lower launch vehicle costs. This makes it an attractive propulsion system choice for future deep space missions.

"The engine remained under vacuum for the entire test, setting a new record in ion engine endurance testing, a true testament to the tremendous effort and skill of the entire team," said Anita Sengupta, staff engineer in JPL's Advanced Propulsion Technology Group. "This unique scientific opportunity benefits current and potential programs."

"The dedicated work of NASA's Solar Electric Technology Application Readiness test team, led by JPL, continues to exemplify a commitment to engineering excellence," said Les Johnson, who leads the In-Space Propulsion Program at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Ala. "This work, along with significant contributions from NASA's Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, will take NASA's space exploration to the next level."

NASA's next-generation ion propulsion efforts are led by the In-Space Propulsion Program, managed by the Office of Space Science at NASA Headquarters and implemented by the Marshall Center. The program seeks to develop advanced propulsion technologies that will help near and mid-term NASA science missions by significantly reducing cost, mass or travel times. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory is managed for NASA by the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, Calif.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: cit; cool; jpl; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: jlogajan
Just one question: Where do you keep all of the fuel? :p
21 posted on 07/31/2003 9:38:28 AM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jlogajan
It wouldn't be appropriate to power a manned passenger ship to Mars with ion motors since ship's systems are complicated by having the life support function that begins to degrade after the passage of fairly short times, but it would be just fine, and economical, for static cargo.
22 posted on 07/31/2003 9:40:19 AM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jimkress
A sample of 1 has no statistical significance.

Actually, it's their second sample. Although the first one is floating around in space somewhere.

23 posted on 07/31/2003 9:41:15 AM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hopespringseternal
It is probably no harder to develop the advanced propulsion ideas than it is to work out the logistical nightmare of a two year mission.

You have a good point. Logistics is a major consideration always. In the military and in manned space missions it is the major consideration.

24 posted on 07/31/2003 9:44:22 AM PDT by RightWhale (Destroy the dark; restore the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

(Twin Ion Engine) Fighter

25 posted on 07/31/2003 9:47:19 AM PDT by CanisMajor2002 (The more protection government provides one group, the more security is lost by everyone else.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Call me when they hit Warp 1.

Can we page you when they have a Twin Ion Engine (TIE) flyer?

;)

26 posted on 07/31/2003 9:50:43 AM PDT by Jay D. Dyson (Leftists are like any other lower life form...they devour their own when it suits their purpose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888
Bistro~math~ics technology

Is this technology 7 people trying to divide up the tab at the neighborhood bar and restaurant?

27 posted on 07/31/2003 9:59:26 AM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Squawk 8888
Still no match for Infinite Improbability or Bistromathics technology.

But I have an infinite number of monkeys with a script they would like you to read...
28 posted on 07/31/2003 10:25:16 AM PDT by cspackler (There are 10 kinds of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jay D. Dyson
Can we page you when they have a Twin Ion Engine (TIE) flyer?

Only if Sienar Fleet Systems fixes that pesky unshielded spot above the exhaust port. Can't leave that open to get my butt shot off...[g]

29 posted on 07/31/2003 10:35:18 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
Get fusion power on-track,

Don't bother waiting for fusion. Use americium-242m which is 100 times as powerful as plutonium. Look it up sometime on google. Search for "Two weeks to Mars".

30 posted on 07/31/2003 2:00:26 PM PDT by techcor (Admin Moderator wannabe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: techcor
True enough. Why point is that VASIMR relies on power input to create thrust, and that's pretty much it. The more power you have, the more stuff you can move faster.

I'll search your suggestion.
31 posted on 07/31/2003 2:04:26 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mhking
When the "Babes" stole Spock's brain, they use an Ion powered space ship. Good for them, go for us!!
32 posted on 07/31/2003 2:16:30 PM PDT by Springman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
The VASIMR variable speed is really a selling point. I think they discontinued research on it though. Nuclear isomer energy storage will be one of the biggest breakthroughs of the early 21st century. Outside of anti-matter and fusion it is the most powerful energy source. Reactors could be built in which the "waste" is half americium 242m and the other half regular americium. There might be a way to use laser light to trigger the release of the energy even faster.
33 posted on 07/31/2003 2:23:08 PM PDT by techcor (What crayon do I use to draw a blank?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: techcor
VASIMR is still a going concern at JSC, I know a couple of people on the team. If you are reading Marshall Spaceflight Center's press releases, you'd think the VASIMR folks were a bunch of hillbillies.
34 posted on 07/31/2003 2:29:45 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: techcor
There might be a way to use laser light to trigger the release of the energy even faster.

Hence, the term, PHOTON ACCELERATOR, came into being.

35 posted on 07/31/2003 3:29:51 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: All
Wanna see it?

ION ENGINE

36 posted on 07/31/2003 5:35:57 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Genesis defender
If you go to any online bookstore and search Douglas Adams you'll find some of the most off-the-wall literature in existence. The two technologies I referred to were from The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.

Infinite improbability technology works by calculating the odds against being at a particular location, then generating an improbability field to match those odds. The result is the instantaneous tranfer to said location. Bistromathics is a relatively new field of scientific research that involves the study of the bizarre behaviour of numbers that occurs when a group of people attempt to split their tab.

37 posted on 08/01/2003 6:31:27 AM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Everyone knows you can't have a successful conspiracy without a Rockefeller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RJL
Exactly. Usually implemented by building a café with robotic waiters and patrons.
38 posted on 08/01/2003 6:32:40 AM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Everyone knows you can't have a successful conspiracy without a Rockefeller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
FWIW, I agree with you, and that's why I like VASIMR better, since your speed is really only limited by your available electrical power. Get fusion power on-track, hook it up to a VASIMR drive, then I think you'll be happy.

Why wait for fusion? A VASIMR will run just as well off fission. And in space, there are no liberals to get in the way.

39 posted on 08/01/2003 6:41:29 AM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BlazingArizona
Oh, certainly fission. That's the baseline source of power for running the VASIMR drive, so, yeah, I'm not suggesting that we wait. Three months to Mars for the crews, six to nine months for many metric tons of cargo. Plus, it allows you the ability to abort and return to Earth pretty much anytime you need to. VASIMR with fission power is nothing to sneeze at.

But fusion gives near-chemical-rocket-level thrust, and is a very sustainable source of power. The timescale for the manned mars transit drops to a month or less. Get to the Moon in a day or so, with a lot of cargo and living space to the lunar surface. It's a big advance that would change a lot about how we get around in space.
40 posted on 08/01/2003 7:59:23 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson