Skip to comments.
Dewhurst: I'm honoring tradition and precedent
Houston Chronicle ^
| July 31, 2003
| LT. GOV. DAVID DEWHURST
Posted on 07/31/2003 8:47:29 AM PDT by Dog Gone
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: justlurking
The Senate has rules regarding attendance or not being absent without an approved okay. However I find no penality specified in their rules for failure to attend. They do provide for expelling a member for misconduct with a 23rds vote.
21
posted on
07/31/2003 9:55:32 AM PDT
by
deport
To: deport
23rds s/b 2/3rds
22
posted on
07/31/2003 9:58:10 AM PDT
by
deport
To: Dog Gone
That is one powerful retort!
23
posted on
07/31/2003 10:04:17 AM PDT
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: Torie
The argument as presented by the Lt. Gov. regarding redistricting.... Sorry I left you off the pings above.
24
posted on
07/31/2003 10:11:07 AM PDT
by
deport
To: Dog Gone; All
This is what our press line needs to be:"We are doing what three Democrat Lt. Gov's done before." If they don't relent then say Hobby, Bullock, and Barnes have don't.
25
posted on
07/31/2003 10:16:42 AM PDT
by
grapeape
(Hope is not a method. - Gen. Hugh Shelton)
To: MeeknMing
Contrary to what our Senate Democrats say, there is no right in the Texas Constitution for legislators to break a quorum.What ever happened to the good old "tradition and precedent" of putting the bums in jail?
To: Brownie74
It appears that we're trying to divide and conquer. If we can entice one Rat to return, we have a quorom. Promise a committee assignment or some pork.
Or go the dirty route and create a family emergency for one of them.
Do something.
27
posted on
07/31/2003 10:22:15 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
By the way, I actually do know how to spell quorum, but somebody forgot to tell my fingers.
28
posted on
07/31/2003 10:23:23 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
I supposed. In the interest of fair and balanced, I'm sure ! lol !
29
posted on
07/31/2003 10:24:41 AM PDT
by
MeekOneGOP
(Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Coming Soon !: Freeper site on Comcast. Found the URL. Gotta fix it now.)
To: Dog Gone
I read somwhere that it was costing them $159.00 a day to stay in the motel. Where are they getting the money?
To: Brownie74
Supposedly, the money is coming from the campaign warchests that each of these senators has.
Whether that's true or not, I don't know. I'm quite sure that Rat contributors will make sure that these lawmakers are not paying out of pocket.
31
posted on
07/31/2003 10:32:02 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: mtbopfuyn
"declare seats vacant and call for a vote"
ARE YOU SERIOUS - CAN THEY DO THAT ..??
If they can .. I'd do it - just to watch them scramble.
32
posted on
07/31/2003 10:33:02 AM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: justlurking
"legislation introduced next session to provide the basis for an office to be declared vacant if these tactics are used again"
Excellant! Time for HARDBALL!!
33
posted on
07/31/2003 10:34:34 AM PDT
by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: Dog Gone
Excellent!
34
posted on
07/31/2003 10:35:17 AM PDT
by
Bobsat
To: Dog Gone
If the money is coming from their campaign warchest isn't that illegal?
To: Brownie74
I don't know, but I have to assume that the GOP is looking into it.
36
posted on
07/31/2003 10:39:19 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: justlurking
"When this is all over, I expect there will be legislation introduced next session to provide the basis for an office to be declared vacant if these tactics are used again."
And they will prevent the law from being passed by skipping the state.
37
posted on
07/31/2003 10:49:08 AM PDT
by
No Truce With Kings
(The opinions expressed are mine! Mine! MINE! All Mine!)
To: Dog Gone
Dewhurst had me worried a couple of months ago; he was not on my favorite list. But since the special sessions began, he has been an articulate defender of the Republican position. I think he was playing good cop, bad cop (now we need really bad cop). Redistricting will happen on our terms if we hold our ground. The Dems will embarrass themselves before that portion of the electorate which even remotely follows the news and which hasn't already swallowed the Kool-Aid.
The drawback in Dem tantrum part deux is that the Dems are setting a horrible precedent DENYING Texans (with likely copycats in the future) representation and embarrassing the state, even as those same cowards take one from the crybaby victimhood liberal playbook. I called John Whitmire's office yesterday, though I doubt it will do any good.
To: Tex_GOP_Cruz
I really don't understand this stunt by the Rats. This has gone way too far for the Republicans to cave in now. They can't stay in New Mexico forever, and eventually the Republicans are going to win. They might as well admit it.
39
posted on
07/31/2003 11:13:40 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: No Truce With Kings
And they will prevent the law from being passed by skipping the state. As I noted to someone else, I don't expect it to pass. But, it will put truant legislators on the hot seat.
Quorum requirements are there to prevent a minority from enacting legislation. It was not intended to be used by a minority to prevent action.
The alternative is for the House and Senate to put some teeth into their own rules about legislators absent without permission.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson