To: Nebullis
It just occurred to be what this is.
A few years back, Alan Sokal spoofed the Lit. Crit. crowd by writing a nonsensical article on quantum gravity and getting it published in a respectable Lit. Crit. journal. This is their revenge. They write a lame rehash of Zeno's paradox, use some obscure New Zealander as a front, and get it published in a physics journal with a, let's be kind and say liberal, editorial policy. In a few days, they'll hold a news conference and announce that physics' air of superiority over the humanities is entirely unjustified, and that physicists can't recognize BS disguised as physics. Or that payback's a bitch.
To: Right Wing Professor
...use some obscure New Zealander as a front, and get it published in a physics journal with a, let's be kind and say liberal...,,, it sounds a bit like money laundering without the money.
119 posted on
07/31/2003 4:56:28 PM PDT by
shaggy eel
("Noo Zealand? Ain't dat a trademark on a pound of butter?")
To: Right Wing Professor
This is their revenge. ROFL!
To: Right Wing Professor
In a few days, they'll hold a news conference and announce that physics' air of superiority over the humanities is entirely unjustified, and that physicists can't recognize BS disguised as physics. Or that payback's a bitch.LOL, we must bookmark this post for later reference!
127 posted on
07/31/2003 6:53:31 PM PDT by
jennyp
(http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
To: Right Wing Professor
It just occurred to be what this is. A few years back, Alan Sokal spoofed the Lit. Crit. crowd by writing a nonsensical article on quantum gravity and getting it published in a respectable Lit. Crit. journal. This is their revenge. They write a lame rehash of Zeno's paradox, use some obscure New Zealander as a front, and get it published in a physics journal with a, let's be kind and say liberal, editorial policy. In a few days, they'll hold a news conference and announce that physics' air of superiority over the humanities is entirely unjustified, and that physicists can't recognize BS disguised as physics. Or that payback's a bitch.Bingo! There is no content in the paper as far as I can tell, just a bunch of technical sounding mumbo-jumbo. The key to your observation is at the bottom of page 4 where Lynds destroys all of the quantities in physics (momentum, energy, etc.) and finishes on page 5 with "Moreover, the universe's initial existence and progression through time would not be possible. Thankfully, it seems nature has wisely traded certainty for continuity".
163 posted on
08/01/2003 11:10:23 PM PDT by
mikegi
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson