It just occurred to be what this is. A few years back, Alan Sokal spoofed the Lit. Crit. crowd by writing a nonsensical article on quantum gravity and getting it published in a respectable Lit. Crit. journal. This is their revenge. They write a lame rehash of Zeno's paradox, use some obscure New Zealander as a front, and get it published in a physics journal with a, let's be kind and say liberal, editorial policy. In a few days, they'll hold a news conference and announce that physics' air of superiority over the humanities is entirely unjustified, and that physicists can't recognize BS disguised as physics. Or that payback's a bitch.Bingo! There is no content in the paper as far as I can tell, just a bunch of technical sounding mumbo-jumbo. The key to your observation is at the bottom of page 4 where Lynds destroys all of the quantities in physics (momentum, energy, etc.) and finishes on page 5 with "Moreover, the universe's initial existence and progression through time would not be possible. Thankfully, it seems nature has wisely traded certainty for continuity".
There is no content in the paper as far as I can tell, just a bunch of technical sounding mumbo-jumbo. Although the paper to which the post refers is not yet available, it's probably just a rewording of the Zeno paper online. In which case, there's not much to it.