Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: quietolong
I don't like telling people what to do, but what about the following...?

Motorcycles are harder to see which makes them more likely to get into an accident. So, a driver of a car hits a motorcycle. The rider gets thrown from the bike and he dies after his head hits a tree (no helmet). What if he would have lived if he were wearing a helmet? What about the driver of the car? Would the charges, if any, be more severe if the rider dies? BTW, I had a relative who died when a car turned in front of him (they didn't see his motorcycle).

9 posted on 07/30/2003 5:17:56 AM PDT by Snowy (My golden retriever can lick your honor student)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Snowy
Sorry, Snowy, but it's none of the gubmint's damned business.

What if this? What if that? What if the gubmint just fixed the roads, sent the police, and guarded the borders? Let the riders and the insurance companies worry about who wears a helmet.

10 posted on 07/30/2003 5:24:36 AM PDT by brewcrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Snowy; All; yall
Here is an excerpt from a Forbes Magazine article, The Wild One. This should be required reading for anyone advocating mandatory helmet use . . .

Why the enthusiasm for helmets? Mike Osborn, chairman of the political action committee of California ABATE, says insurance companies are big supporters of helmet laws, citing the "public burden" argument. That is, reckless bikers sans helmets are raising everyone's car insurance rates by running headlong into plate-glass windows and the like, sustaining expensive head injuries.

Actually, it's true that bikers indirectly jack up the rates of car drivers, but not for the reason you might think. Car drivers plow over bikers at an alarming rate. According to the Second International Congress on Automobile Safety, the car driver is at fault in more than 70% of all car/motorcycle collisions. A typical accident occurs when a motorist illegally makes a left turn into the path of an oncoming motorcycle, turning the biker into an unwitting hood ornament. In such cases, juries tend to award substantial damages to the injured biker. Car insurance premiums go up.

Osborn sees a hidden agenda. "They [the insurance companies] want to get us off the road." Fewer bikes means fewer claims against car drivers. Helmet laws do accomplish that goal, as evidenced by falling motorcycle registrations in helmet-law states. It is interesting to note that carriers of motorcycle insurance do not complain about their clients. Motorcycle liability insurance remains cheap. Osborn pays only $125 per year for property damage and personal injury liability because motorcycles cause little damage to others.

27 posted on 07/31/2003 8:58:36 PM PDT by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson