Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: discostu
Luckily this kind of thing tends to be self correcting, when there aren't enough fish to catch profitably we cut down on the catches (already are with many breeds we're now farming) this gives that fish time to recover population, which will eventually result in them being profitable for massive fishing again.

There is truth to what you say, but you are oversimplifying. What happens when you have government subsidized fishing? Then the fishing fleet fishes even in depleted waters, which can drive some species to extinction. Japan, for example, which does not tolerate unemployment well, may happily keep their fleet going using drift nets until vast areas of the ocean are turned into deserts. And they are not the only country that would prefer to keep their fishing fleets employed regardless of the catch. The PRC, for example, uses some (many) of its fishing vessals for intelligence gathering.

23 posted on 07/29/2003 10:08:09 AM PDT by dark_lord (The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: dark_lord
My understanding is the spy-trawlers don't catch much fish. What'll happen from Japan's activity is that they'll make the area unable to support fish and the fish will stop coming. The ocean's big, the Pacific is almost an entire hemisphere, lots of place for fish to hide. Subsidizing might tilt the scale but eventually even that becomes too expensive. We might lose a couple of species but that too is the natural course of things, extinction happens.
27 posted on 07/29/2003 10:12:45 AM PDT by discostu (the train that won't stop going, no way to slow down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson