Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stadium deals
The Las Vegas Review-Journal ^ | Tuesday, July 29, 2003 | editorial

Posted on 07/29/2003 9:37:39 AM PDT by Willie Green

For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.

The glut of taxpayer-financed sports facilities constructed throughout the 1990s did more than drain local coffers -- it dinged federal taxpayers as well.

A report published in The Washington Post on Monday noted that, thanks to a loophole in the Internal Revenue Code, backers of local sports facilities have issued more than $6.3 billion in bonds that are exempt from federal taxes. The cost to the Treasury: as much as $500 million a year.

"The advantage of tax-exempt bonds is that they allow cities, counties, stadium authorities and other public entities to borrow money at lower interest rates, saving millions of dollars annually on debt repayment," the Post reports. "Bond investors accept the lower rates because their earnings are not taxed."

While this money may be a drop in the bucket, relatively speaking -- the federal budget this year totals some $2.1 trillion -- the subsidy is difficult to justify.

Barry Platt, communications director for stadium critic Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., accurately calls this tax break "a very expensive public housing program for millionaires -- a subsidy for the millionaires who own these teams and the millionaire athletes who play on them."

The issue here is not whether communities should dedicate public funds to support sports franchises. Some facilities are boondoggles, pure and simple. Others can spur economic development, become a cultural attraction or alleviate urban blight.

But the construction of sports arenas is not the concern of the federal government. Congress should close this loophole and allow local officials to decide -- based on the merits of the proposal -- whether public support of a stadium is a worthwhile cause.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: irs; sports; sportspork; stadiums; taxes

1 posted on 07/29/2003 9:37:40 AM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
--send this to Steve Wynn and Oscar Goodman--just as a reminder--
2 posted on 07/29/2003 9:51:00 AM PDT by rellimpank (Stop immigration now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green
Why are taxpayer dollars supporting these private businesses?
3 posted on 07/29/2003 10:00:11 AM PDT by Acolyte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Acolyte
There is a vast swath of the population who has attached their self esteem to sports teams and personalities. When their team wins, they feel like they have won or somehow accomplished something. Same for when the team loses. These people vote for these stadiums because they feel like it is a vote for themselves and that "they" have upgraded a part of their lives.
4 posted on 07/29/2003 10:07:52 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green; chambley1
Fortunately, it looks like the Arlington County Board has killed the Virginia bid to throw eight-digit subsidies at baseball (such a deal!).
5 posted on 07/30/2003 6:08:40 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green; Acolyte
Another positive development -- the Portland wing of the shakedown is also DOA.
6 posted on 08/07/2003 8:45:25 AM PDT by steve-b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson