Let BRAVO Know What You THINK About Their Homosexual Agenda!

07/29/03 | Kieri

[OPS4]

Why should you care? I know for fact that enough people
like the Million dads and freerepublic, and 20 other
forums will create a ground swell and in the past we have
made a big difference, just look at the results at milliondads.com.

We have had many advertisers pull support, as on the sheild,
and other shows.

So your post of not doing anything, is like asking us to avoid a subject that we cannot, as conservatives,
afterall, sodom and gomorah were condemed in the Holy
Bible, maybe not in the Texas Courts, I choose
the Holy Bible as my rule of law.

Ops4 God Bless America!

OPs4

[Bluntpoint]

Is any else sick of these fags as I am?

Try to cut down a bit.

[sakic]

They've already been programmed by liberal TV programs - and the parents watch with glee as their little brains of mush get twisted.

That means that if you were a child today you'd have a good chance of being a homosexual.

I knew lots of homosexuals while growing up but it never interested me as a lifestyle. Maybe some of us are more heterosexual than others.

[Timesink]

BRAVO is owned by NBC, no?

Yes. NBC bought them just a few months ago. They were looking for a cable outlet for their network shows, just like ABC has ABC Family and CBS has TNN (and MTV ... and VH1 ... and Nickelodeon ... and on and on). For example, The Worst Wing is about to start airing on Bravo in a few weeks (if it hasn't already started).

[VetsRule]

Studies show that boys who are molested by men later become men who molest boys. That is not "Biological".

I'm afraid you badly misunderstand the meaning of "biological basis." There are very few behavioral patterns which are solely the result of a "purely" biological or "purely" environmental basis. Yet correlations and trends can easily be determined.

The facts and studies have shown that identical twins, even ones reared apart from each other, have a vastly increased chance of being the same sexuality as each other, compared to non-identical siblings or the general population.

There are also studies showing an decrease in the size of certain glands within the neuroendocrine pathway in homosexuals, compared to non-homosexuals.

Certainly, major trauma on a child can deeply impact that child's development. Any child, male or female, who has been sexually assaulted will have deep scars that only time and much therapy can heal.

That does not change the fact, however, that a real, biological basis for homosexuality exists, despite the best efforts of anti-science people to deny it.

VR

[Quick1]

Great post.

[VetsRule]

Please explain it's biological origin.

A decade ago, genes implicating homosexuality in males were isolated to the X chromosome.

Sorry to be the bearer of (apparently) bad news.

VR

[finnman69]

I predict one day scientists will identify a gene defect that is related to homosexuality.

[VetsRule]

Yawn. Please see my posts 165 and 167 for more information. Feel free to ignore me if you like, however. My strong impression of anti-science people has been that they prefer to willfully ignore inconvenient scientific facts when those facts interfere with their prejudices and/or worldview.

VR

[Marysecretary]

All these types of shows do is make homosexuality seem like it's normal and no big deal. It's like the old proverbial frog in the pan. He doesn't realize he's getting boiled until it's too late. That's what the homosexual agenda is all about, normalizing their behavior.

[MineralMan]

"We have had many advertisers pull support, as on the sheild,
and other shows. "

OK. Which of those shows are off the air, then? It's your perfect right to do as you wish. You can boycott, send letters, or stand in front of the headquarters of the network holding a sign.

Now, guess which amendment to the Constitution guarantees you those rights? It's the First Amendment, which also guarantees the rights of every other citizen, including those with whom you disagree.

The folks who are making these two admittedly stupid programs on Bravo, have a right to do so. Far as I know, there's no obscenity on either show, so the FCC can't say much.

But, you're free, just as they are, to protest in any legal way you wish. I would not ever deny you that right. But...do keep in mind that others have rights as well to speak their minds and publish their works.

Only if everyone has the right does anyone have the right.

[Marysecretary]

Right on! The homosexual agenda is to normalize it so people don't complain about it any more. It's subtle and very dangerous.

[Quick1]

" No one chooses to be gay." PROVE IT OR RETRACT IT.

Could YOU choose to be gay, right now? Can you suddenly, "bat for the other team", as it were? Personally, I couldn't choose to be gay, which makes me think homosexuals didn't choose, either.

[sakic]

Huh?

[MineralMan]

"just look at the results at milliondads.com.
"

I tried www.milliondads.com and it doesn't exist. Perhaps you'd supply a link?

[MichiganConservative]

You could have MichiganConservativeSatellite up and running in just a year or two, offering just the channels you think are appropriate to that consuming public out there.

Why did you twist my desire for a new programming plan into a desire to control what other people want? You got a chip on your shoulder or something? In which post did I say I wanted to control what channels YOU can watch? I just think a lot of channels are crap and personally do not want to watch them (such as the Disney channel, CNN, TechTV, Univision, etc).

What is YOUR problem? Your rediculous sarcasm seems to indicate you have one and I believe your sarcasm directed towards me is uncalled for. Can I not have an opinion about the quality of TV programming or the service I get from a company?

[Timesink]

Wait, they are good looking,stylish and well groomed...they must be gay

No, just about 45 years old each and unfunny.

[Justice]

The best way to "normalize" deviant behavior is thru humor.

What we need is more wholesome monogamous heterosexual emphases, not emphases on the deviants.

[VetsRule]

Could YOU choose to be gay, right now? Can you suddenly, "bat for the other team", as it were? Personally, I couldn't choose to be gay, which makes me think homosexuals didn't choose, either.

Exactly. There have been gay people all throughout history, even during times when to be discovered as gay would have meant near-instant death.

Who the hell would CHOOSE to be that way?

VR

[Marysecretary]

Do you have kids? I'd be very afraid......