Skip to comments.
A GADGET GEEK?S DREAM COME TRUE: PUNCH ?PRINT? FOR ANYTHING YOU WANT
Smalltimes ^
| July 25, 2003
| David Pescovitz
Posted on 07/28/2003 1:38:58 PM PDT by sourcery
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
07/28/2003 1:38:58 PM PDT
by
sourcery
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Libertarianize the GOP; Free the USA
FYI
2
posted on
07/28/2003 1:39:23 PM PDT
by
sourcery
(The Evil Party thinks their opponents are stupid. The Stupid Party thinks their opponents are evil.)
To: sourcery
This will surely make blow-up adult dolls obsolete!
To: sourcery
Anybody see the movie "Weird Science"?
Remember what those kids built with this technology?
4
posted on
07/28/2003 1:43:28 PM PDT
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: sourcery
Model-making from a printer is something we heard of 3-4 years ago in the CAD industry. But a model is one thing and a machined piece of metal is another. Still not Star Trek.
5
posted on
07/28/2003 1:46:18 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Destroy the dark; restore the light)
To: sourcery
6
posted on
07/28/2003 1:50:47 PM PDT
by
SC DOC
To: sourcery
3M uses a similar technology (and has for at least 8 years)to produce mechanical samples of fairly complex sockets. For example, long before that 900 pin socket on your motherboard was around, a sample of what that socket was created. This sample was used to help work out the bugs before a tool and die machine made the production socket we all know and love. It's a fascinating process to watch. The socket is first designed in software, then lasers hit and fuse material together, inside a tank containing a special plastic resin with micro-encapulated reagants. The lasers cause a chemical reaction to take place on the near-microscopic level, making a small blob of solid plastic in a liquid plastic tank. The lasers then continue on, building the socket up from the lowest levels, until the piece is finally completed. A few hours later, the pieces are all hand assembled and delivered to the engineers to play with (and then break). Super neato... Looks like they have come quite a ways in the past few years.
7
posted on
07/28/2003 1:56:14 PM PDT
by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: RightWhale
I would say it's approaching at about Warp 7, though. In a decade, I'm betting.
8
posted on
07/28/2003 2:00:12 PM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: sourcery
CNN and Tech TV have done stories on creating organs this way. Need a new liver? Print one out for you. I pity some technician of the future have to clean out some print queue because someone hit "print" for their liver a dozen times.
9
posted on
07/28/2003 2:04:03 PM PDT
by
techcor
(Admin Moderator wannabe)
To: RightWhale
Tea, hot, Earl Gray
10
posted on
07/28/2003 2:04:35 PM PDT
by
redangus
To: hchutch
There is hope that we can get you that dream date after all. Send our crack research team the specifications...
11
posted on
07/28/2003 2:05:30 PM PDT
by
L,TOWM
(Liberals, The Other White Meat)
To: Frank_Discussion
In a decade, I'm betting. Bet, sure, but it's too soon to invest. As an addition to the portfolio it would have to join asteroid mining and the cure for cancer and whatever else ails us, not to mention clone babies. It's part of that small fraction of the nest egg that won't be missed if lost but will make the heirs go 'hmmm, maybe not so stodgy after all' when they break open the inheritance box. It is part of the asteroid mining process already, BTW.
12
posted on
07/28/2003 2:14:26 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Destroy the dark; restore the light)
To: RightWhale
Hmmm... As a college student, I remember rapid prototyping techniques being discussed as super-expensive and built by large rudimentary devices for single-piece parts. Of low quality, too. Ten years or so down the road, I've seen functional assemblies come off of a machine no bigger than a copier machine. In different colors and with smooth surfaces. Certainly not production quality, but still very good for engineering evaluations.
Another decade will tell the tale, and it will be interesting.
13
posted on
07/28/2003 2:22:35 PM PDT
by
Frank_Discussion
(May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
To: Frank_Discussion
Bump to read everyone's response later.
14
posted on
07/28/2003 2:29:20 PM PDT
by
BushCountry
(To the last, I will grapple with Democrats. For hate's sake, I spit my last breath at Liberals.)
To: RightWhale
Model-making from a printer is something we heard of 3-4 years ago in the CAD industry. But a model is one thing and a machined piece of metal is another. We print real, functional metal parts from CAD models.
Prometal
SD
To: SoothingDave
That's more like it. Tnx for sharing.
16
posted on
07/28/2003 2:36:22 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Destroy the dark; restore the light)
To: sourcery
I wonder how the Feds will controll what is being produced? (hint: think about background checking).
17
posted on
07/28/2003 2:39:43 PM PDT
by
templar
To: sourcery
You just know where this will lead. Hackers will manage to capture the data used to create the object, then you and I could go on Kazza and download them to print ourselves hard goods. Then watch all heck break loose.
18
posted on
07/28/2003 2:41:07 PM PDT
by
Grig
To: sourcery
bump
19
posted on
07/28/2003 2:41:39 PM PDT
by
VOA
To: SoothingDave
Very cool
How is structural integrity of the steel skeleton in comparison to machined parts?
20
posted on
07/28/2003 2:43:13 PM PDT
by
CyberCowboy777
(They promise to be good masters, but they mean to be masters.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson