Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Frank_Discussion
Ok.

IMPEACH

28 posted on 07/28/2003 1:47:11 PM PDT by mattdono
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: mattdono
Yeah, baby! And up the river, I say. To the Big House.
32 posted on 07/28/2003 1:49:31 PM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: mattdono
(re Impeachment)

The trick to that is overcoming the very obstacle we're already facing: the 2/3 quorum rule.

Although it is true that the TX Senate, which tries impeachees, only needs a 2/3 OF THOSE PRESENT to convict, I don't see any exception to the 2/3 quorum rule for impeachment trials. So we couldn't get a quorum in the first place if the Dems bolt. (I'm assuming that the TX House can must the 2/3 votes but that the TX Senate can't.)
37 posted on 07/28/2003 1:56:23 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: mattdono
One radical response to bolting is this:
1) Call special session of Senate.
2) Dems bolt
3) TX House IMPEACHES some of bolting Dems
4) Upon such impeachment, those Dems are automatically suspended from their Senate seats, and the Gov. may appoint provisional replacement Senators. (TX Const., Art. 15, sec. 5.)

What say?
38 posted on 07/28/2003 1:57:02 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson