[ninenot]

Laziness is a part--but the real predicate is inertia.

And, frankly, it's very hard for ANYONE to believe that the US Gummint, or even most local yokels, are out to grab the guns and impose unilateral rules/regs/laws.

Think about it...

With Hillary back in the White House, however, the perceptions might change.

[appalachian_dweller]

>> hard for ANYONE to believe that the US Gummint, or even most local yokels, are out to grab the guns <<

The grabbers claim it's to lower crime, but there's plenty of info that indicates that when law-abiding citizens are disarmed crime, violent crime, skyrockets. England, Australia, Washington DC are all very good examples of this.

It seems to me that liberals like to hide their head in the sand. They don't want to know the truth. I was debating gun control with a liberal friend. I reminded her of how the SCOTUS decided that the police were not responsible for our individual safety, that our safety was our own responsibility . To that she said, "Stop depressing me." The conversation ended there.

So the libs really don't want to be FREE, they want to be SAFE. Freedom does not mean being safe and Freedom's currency is blood.

I'll die free before I’ll live as a slave ... or a subject.