To: Huck
BS. With our current tax burden, and the way it is skewed toward raping the middle class, your "conservative assumptions" crap is so much male bovine fecal effluvia.
18 posted on
07/28/2003 11:58:35 AM PDT by
sauropod
("Come over here and make me. I dare you. You little fruitcake, you little fruitcake.")
To: sauropod
With our current tax burden, and the way it is skewed toward raping the middle class, your "conservative assumptions" crap is so much male bovine fecal effluvia. When a person is taking a mortgage, in your opinion, that person should or should not consider prevailing tax laws, expected income, savings, expenses, etc?
And a follow up--should that person, if they choose to consider such things, use rosy forecasts or conservative ones?
19 posted on
07/28/2003 12:03:38 PM PDT by
Huck
To: sauropod
The tax system is intentionally designed to rape the middle class in order to keep most of us from ever becoming rich. A rich person is an independent person, and an independent person can't be controlled or manipulated.
38 posted on
07/28/2003 12:32:12 PM PDT by
jpl
To: sauropod
The biggest tax problem in New Jersey is property taxes and spending more than $8000 per year on students when many private schools can and do give students a better education for less money is a crime. Of course New Jersey could have had a governor who was for school vouchers and cutting taxes instead of a sleazy politician who is in the pocket of more sleazy special interest groups than Bob Torricelli but New Jersey voters just had to protect their abortion rights and gun control at the expense of common sense. The election of McGreevey is the only thing more baffling than the election of Frank Lautenberg's corpse. I can only hope that McGreevey will create a Florio-like religious experience for New Jersey voters.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson