Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clift Suggests Sons Killed to Silence Them on Lack of WMD
MediaResearchCenter ^ | Monday July 28, 2003 | BrentBaker

Posted on 07/28/2003 9:23:08 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay

Uday and Qusay killed to keep them silent on lack of WMD? Newsweek’s Eleanor Clift suggested on the McLaughlin Group over the weekend that the in killing Uday and Qusay Hussein, “two intelligence assets who could potentially lead us to the weapons of mass destruction,” the Bush administration “surrendered a major opportunity to uncover” those weapons “unless,” she added nefariously, “they don’t believe those weapons are there.”

Later, she equated President Bush’s State of the Union line about Iraq “seeking” uranium in Africa with the tape erasure in the Nixon White House: “The 16 words are taking on the aura of the 18-minute gap under a former President.”

On the deaths of Saddam Hussein’s sons, Clift argued: “The way they went sent another message. You don’t send in a TOW missile if you want to capture them alive. And these are two intelligence assets who could potentially lead us to the weapons of mass destruction. And the fact that the administration really made very little attempt to take them alive -- they wanted to spare themselves the headache of a trial -- but they also surrendered a major opportunity to uncover the real reason we went to war -- unless they don’t believe those weapons are there.”

In her weekly MSNBC.com column on Friday, Clift offered a less accusatory version of the same theme, arguing that finding the weapons of mass destruction “would be such a huge win for the administration that you would think they would have gone to greater lengths to take Uday and Qusay alive.”

An excerpt from Clift’s July 25 column on MSNBC.com:

....The war in Iraq was fought to disarm Saddam, but the way the commanders on the ground went in after Uday and Qusay shows the administration is not serious about finding weapons of mass destruction. These were the two best intelligence assets, short of Saddam, that the administration could capture. U.S. troops offered them a chance to surrender, and then called in a barrage from helicopter gunships. By killing the brothers, the administration saved itself the headache of a trial but lost the opportunity to prove a link with Al Qaeda or solve the mystery of the missing WMD.

I don’t necessarily quarrel with the decision. Bringing peace and a new order to Iraq would be harder with Saddam’s sons alive. But if the Bush administration really were looking for WMD, these two men were key. It increasingly looks as though the WMD have disappeared. They may be scattered and already in the hands of terrorists. Saddam could have destroyed them before the war, or years earlier, and simply was bluffing to menace his neighbors. Or they could be buried somewhere. Finding them would be such a huge win for the administration that you would think they would have gone to greater lengths to take Uday and Qusay alive....

END of Excerpt

For Clift’s piece in full: www.msnbc.com


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bias; eleanorclift; iraq; meltdown; newsweek; qusay; uday; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
Uday and Qusay = WMD, Eleanor
1 posted on 07/28/2003 9:23:09 AM PDT by fight_truth_decay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Does she have any source for this allegation or just (not)thinking aloud?
2 posted on 07/28/2003 9:24:29 AM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Eleanor Clift is a worthless bitter hag. She is biased, uninformed and in complete denial.
3 posted on 07/28/2003 9:25:08 AM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Clift is the liberals' answer to the question no one asked or cares about ...
4 posted on 07/28/2003 9:25:15 AM PDT by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
If memory serves, clift is a shill for the clintonistas. So this must be the new clinton party line.
5 posted on 07/28/2003 9:25:43 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
O Eleanor hello! they shot first...
6 posted on 07/28/2003 9:26:07 AM PDT by Republicus2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
“The way they went sent another message. You don’t send in a TOW missile if you want to capture them alive.

Uh, Eleanor, they had already shot and wounded several of our troops - so the commander sent in a TOW missile because he wanted to keep OUR men alive. What a certifiable idiot.

7 posted on 07/28/2003 9:28:13 AM PDT by dirtboy (Free Sabertooth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Yep. This was the lady that basically said rape is horrible unless it is a democrat committing it. Then it it fine and the girl should "get over it".
8 posted on 07/28/2003 9:28:58 AM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Good old Eleanor...where does she come up with such BS? Let's see, the firefight took over three hours. I'd be willing to bet that Saddam's "boys" were given multiple opportunities to surrender, and they chose to fight to the death.

Surrrrrrrrrrrrrreeeeeeeeeee...Uday & Qusay chose to die rather than giving up the goods about Daddy's WMD. BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!

9 posted on 07/28/2003 9:29:20 AM PDT by Night Hides Not
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
If she just SHARED her drugs...............
10 posted on 07/28/2003 9:29:24 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
vile bile
11 posted on 07/28/2003 9:29:26 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
But if the Bush administration really were looking for WMD, these two men were key.

These guys didn't know poo-squat about WMD, and if they did, would anyone trust them? No, the real information is going to come from the scientists. Seems to me like the brothers were too busy with torturing athletes and hand-washing to know where the weapons might be.

12 posted on 07/28/2003 9:30:20 AM PDT by TrebleRebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
There just aren't words. What's even scarier is that she's getting paid to spew this drivel. Glad I'm not a stockholder...
13 posted on 07/28/2003 9:30:37 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
=
14 posted on 07/28/2003 9:30:47 AM PDT by new cruelty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgc1122
While I love the Fri nite McLaughlin show, I detest Eleanot Clift. This woman couldn't admit to something against the Dems if her life depended on it. She and others need a down in the ditches trip to most of the countries who are American Haters. No limos, no five star hotels, no extras of any kind. She needs a long session with the women who were raped and sodomized by the crazy Hussein bros to get a dose of reality. What are the chances that somewhere in all the stuff our soldiers have found in Iraq there is tape(s) of the people put into plastic chippers by Hussein? The largest sales of rose-colored glasses has to be to the Dems.
She seems to practice being ignorant...and public television which we all pay for...panders to her and her ilk. she's disgusting.
15 posted on 07/28/2003 9:32:12 AM PDT by ridesthemiles (ridesthemiles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
You're way too easy on her.

She's what I call a "channel changer". If I see her or hear her, I change the channel. I can't stand her.
16 posted on 07/28/2003 9:32:23 AM PDT by You Dirty Rats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
This is low, even for her. I'd like to smack her ugly face.
17 posted on 07/28/2003 9:32:58 AM PDT by mombonn (Have you prayed for our President yet today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
I could not work with liberals.... I would be too tempted to try to beat some sense into them with a club.

Sean Hannity gets my award for most patience- he says the question he is asked most frequently is how he keeps from beating the pi$$ out of alan colmes...
18 posted on 07/28/2003 9:35:02 AM PDT by Mr. K (VEY series about everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

With that kind of reach this goofball should be playing for the NBA!

I love the smell of desperation in the morning...

19 posted on 07/28/2003 9:35:32 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Californians are as dumm as a sack of rocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fight_truth_decay
U.S. forces got almost daily tips about Saddam & Sons being here or there.

By Clift's reasoning, U.S. troops would be forced to capture every Iraqi in every firefight alive in case they turned out to be a Big Fish. U.S. casualty counts would then skyrocket.........and she would then blame Bush.

20 posted on 07/28/2003 9:36:36 AM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson