Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
I have a few disagreements with your analysis:

If Bush wins 1 million more votes nationally (which means the Dem loses 1 million more votes),

Only about 46% of eligible voters go to the polls. Bush could get millions of votes without the Dem losing even one (in fact, they could both gain a lot)

think of the incredible swing of states such as NM (335 total votes difference), Iowa (about 5,000), Wisconsin (about 11,000), Oregon, and even Pennsylvania and Michigan.

At least some of those states could have been contested in 2000. NM switched to Gore after an election official found a "misplaced" box of ballots. PA went for Gore mostly because of the big cities, where turnout was 125% in some districts. And I forget whether it was Wisconsin or Michigan where students were told how to vote both at home and at school.

The GOP finally got to work on poll watching operations in 2002. The effort wasn't perfect, but GOPers were elected in some places they wouldn't have been otherwise.
I think we're going to see some previously solidly Dem states in the GOP column.

39 posted on 07/27/2003 5:04:37 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: speekinout
I'm not sure I follow: you aren't "disagreeing" with me, so much as saying that in fact the numbers could be WAY over on Bush's side?
52 posted on 07/28/2003 7:41:06 AM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson