Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Accusation of Bias Angers Democrats--Gotta Love It!!!
New York Times ^ | July 26, 2003 | ROBIN TONER

Posted on 07/26/2003 9:07:32 PM PDT by publius1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Truth hurts!
1 posted on 07/26/2003 9:07:33 PM PDT by publius1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: publius1
"I think there's an element of the far left of the Democratic Party that sees as its project scrubbing the public square of religion, and in some cases not only religion but of religious people."

"I think there's an element of the far left of the Democratic Party that sees as its project scrubbing the public square of religion, and in some cases not only religion but of religious people."
2 posted on 07/26/2003 9:12:20 PM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
If they are concerned about "tactics" they better not look in the mirror!
3 posted on 07/26/2003 9:14:43 PM PDT by visualops
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .45MAN; AKA Elena; al_c; american colleen; Angelus Errare; Antoninus; aposiopetic; Aquinasfan; ...
Oh, this one is so worth reading! Ping!
4 posted on 07/26/2003 9:17:23 PM PDT by Polycarp (How can you say there are too many children, it is like saying there are too many flowers-MthrTeresa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: visualops
If they are concerned about "tactics" they better not look in the mirror!

Will it crack or do their faces not reflect in mirrors?

5 posted on 07/26/2003 9:22:10 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: visualops
If they are concerned about "tactics" they better not look in the mirror!

Mirror, Mirror on the Wall,

Who's the slimiest party of them all?
6 posted on 07/26/2003 9:25:17 PM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Coleus
Ping
7 posted on 07/26/2003 9:28:23 PM PDT by MattinNJ (As soon as we could see out of our big black eye, man, we lit up your world like the 4th of July)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
"I think there's an element of the far left of the Democratic Party that sees as its project scrubbing the public square of religion, and in some cases not only religion but of religious people."

BINGO

8 posted on 07/26/2003 9:33:15 PM PDT by Mo1 (Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: publius1
Wherever there is an angry Democrat, there are 5 spineless Republicans happy to give in to their wicked, twisted demands.
9 posted on 07/26/2003 9:34:39 PM PDT by Captainpaintball (RINOs should be on the endangered species list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
Durbin:

"I understand the painful process I have to go through with the elders of the church on many of these issues, explaining my position.

"Elders of the [Roman Catholic] Church"?

Has Jocelyn Elders converted to Catholicism?

10 posted on 07/26/2003 9:53:29 PM PDT by syriacus (Dock the pay of politicians who boycott.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
The bigoted purge of practicing Catholics began when the democrat Governor of Pennsylvania was denied the right to speak at the national convention several years ago (He was pro-life).

The purge is now complete. No practicing Catholic judge will ever be allowed to sit on any federal court if the democrats can prevent this. Same applies to any devout Protestant or Jew, especially (but not only) if they oppose abortion.

For that matter, any judge who defends the Constitution and is scrupulously honest will be opposed.

11 posted on 07/26/2003 9:56:31 PM PDT by friendly ((Badges?, we don gots to show no stinkin' badges!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
How come you rarely hear that Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg was council for the effing ACLU. And on the board as well, I believe. Come on, let's give weenie Orin some help.

Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg was council for the ACLU.
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg was council for the ACLU.
12 posted on 07/26/2003 10:02:11 PM PDT by SF Geo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
Reminds me of when Clarence Thomas hit back at his liberal inquisitors by describing his hearing as "a high tech lynching of an uppity black man." I vividly remember the moment and the horror on the Democrats faces when their race card was thrown back in their faces. It was a moment to savor.
13 posted on 07/26/2003 10:03:37 PM PDT by Reaganesque
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
Hasn't haterd of Catholics been a part of the demon-rats play book ever scince the KKK was their activist arm?
14 posted on 07/26/2003 10:11:51 PM PDT by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
Mr. Durbin, an Illinois Democrat who personally opposes abortion but backs abortion rights,

"errr..well I personally believe abortion is killing a human life, but..ahhhh... I wouldn't want to offend anyone who wanted one..."
I'll never understand people who take this position. Weak, very weak.

15 posted on 07/26/2003 10:12:16 PM PDT by JPJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPJones
Ann Coulter for the Supreme Court. Demorats have a long line of bias. And the list gets longer every appointment.
16 posted on 07/26/2003 10:17:32 PM PDT by Brimack34 (I Hate Tim Russert)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: publius1
Brilliant...simply brilliant. Maybe our friends in the Stupid Party are finally learning how this game works.

And it this case, the Reps, if they adopt this line can win politically AND be telling the truth.

Anti-religious bigotry is rife on the left.
17 posted on 07/26/2003 10:25:06 PM PDT by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: publius1
Mr. Durbin, an Illinois Democrat who personally opposes abortion but backs abortion rights, added, "I understand the painful process I have to go through with the elders of the church on many of these issues, explaining my position. But it is galling, to say the least, when my colleagues in the Senate, of another religion, start speaking ex cathedra."

It is galling, Mr. Durbin, when colleagues of another religion understand your religion better than you do! Who do you think was closer to what the Pope says, you or Mr. Sessions?

18 posted on 07/26/2003 10:50:51 PM PDT by nickcarraway (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
Wherever there is an angry Democrat, there are 5 spineless Republicans happy to give in to their wicked, twisted demands.

sad, but true.

19 posted on 07/26/2003 11:01:47 PM PDT by nickcarraway (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: publius1
The democRATS are not anti-Catholic. They are anti-Christian.
20 posted on 07/26/2003 11:23:37 PM PDT by jimkress (Go away Pat Go away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson