Why Bush Made the Middle East Safer

Washington Post ^ | 7/25/03 | By Charles Krauthammer

[Arpege92]

Sounds like Clinton is executing a little damage control for the democrats!

[norraad]

Exactly like children, you can't let them run amuck, they just don't have the ability yet.

Sounds harsh & cruel to those who don't understand, but that doesn't make it any less true.

[timestax]

BUMP TO THE TOP!!

[MatthewViti]

Where is the BARF ALERT?

[OPS4]

Over on the democrats propaganda sites!
We do not barf on the truth!

Ops4 God CLess America!

[T Lady]

As always, Charles Krauthammer gets it right. And for ONCE, just once, ladies and gentleman, Bill Clinton got it right by stating the obvious about intelligence gathering: it isn't always 100%, and that perhaps some of the things President Bush mentioned in the SOTUA should have been kept out. Just moments ago on the radio, yet another whining Demo-freak was complaining to Michael Medved about how we should "just let the U.N. (the Diety of the Progressive Left) take over, since Bush has placed us in "a quagmire" (one of their favorite, overused terms). Since they apparently cannot come up with any viable solutions, the only option the Dims continue to use is the 'Attack and Complain' mode, which has continuously backfired. Of course the Administration could have handled this misstep more smoothly, but it's nothing more than another Dimo-tempest in a latte pot.

-Regards, T.