Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

View From the Rail: Beware! 'Seabiscuit' may inspire some hope
Seattle Post Intelligencer ^ | 7/25/2003 | Larry Lee Palmer

Posted on 07/26/2003 12:07:53 AM PDT by ex-Texan

View From the Rail: Beware! 'Seabiscuit' may inspire some hope

I love the new "Seabiscuit" movie so much it hurts. What do you expect from a railbird?

But for those of you who don't like heaping dollops of poetry and lush cinematography to go along with a great story, it's going to be tough love.

I want to encourage those with type-A personalities to hang in there.

So please read this review with your tongue firmly in your cheek.

Once in a great while a movie comes along that everyone should see. Don't miss this film.

It's a story about our American heritage that illuminates many of the heartaches our society has been subjected to, and offers up hope from days past toward a better future -- not just for the Sport of Kings, but for the world in which our children will inherit.

Curmudgeons and smash-mouth realists of the world unite -- it's going to take grim determination to keep "Seabiscuit" away from our X-treme TV-oriented offspring.

Take a stand.

Don't let them be pulled in by the dazzling derring-do of the Dreamworks film crew that drops them dead-center into a herd of stampeding horse flesh. What's the thrill of watching skateboarders wipe out when you can watch jockeys get trampled in Technicolor by wild-eyed thoroughbreds hell bent for leather?

"Seabiscuit" even sports a passel of our Emerald Downs homeboys beating each other bloody with whips on horseback, bouncing off rails of bush-track bullrings, and disappearing under the terrible cacophony of razor-edged hooves.

Is this suitable summer blockbuster fare for saddle-sore, couch-potato cowboys?

You bet it is.

This movie sports no mind-numbing "woo-woo" new-age Kung-fu warriors beating each other senseless in midair; no machine-made gods of some new millennium that liquify before our eyes only to reappear as black patent-leather sex-goddesses on steroids.

No, these movie moguls are too smart for that.

They resort to the clever ruse of a true story that clamps down on young, impressionable minds.

After the teaser of racetrack violence they get Tobey Maguire to play Red Pollard, a young jockey who reads poetry to his horse and races over the rickety wooden bridge of childhood, only to crash headlong into the brutal world of men.

This feel-good saga has broken, Depression-era men who heal themselves or are healed by women who love them.

What's the alternative -- reality TV, where fantasy dates talk trash to fantasy mates?

It gets worse.

Jeff Bridges plays Charles Howard, a self-made man who transcends the death of his only child with elusive curatives like kindness and generosity.

Chris Cooper fills the role of Tom Smith, a soft-spoken trainer who mourns the demise of the American West and fights back by conquering the inner demons of a horse who won't be tamed by a whip.

Did you know Smith won the training title at Longacres in 1935? The year before that, he slept in a stall while mustangs in his dreams circled Mount Rainier.

This story is too close to home.

"Seabiscuit" the movie segues between the sad world of men without hope and the mindless joy of a boy on a horse galloping through oak groves. It's a moody, reflective, ultimately joyful-tone poem that brazenly broaches the subject of bitterness vs. transcendence, pride vs. wisdom.

This flick is My Friend Flicka meets The Horse Whisperer meets Dr. Phil.

It's Beauty and the Beast stapled over the story of The Black Stallion.

Protect your children from this senseless celluloid carnage.

The movie dares to suggest that hope can conquer hype, pedigree, insurmountable odds, and whatever else you got, mister.

Don't fall for it.

In the Great Depression, who needed hope? Americans needed jobs, not rose-colored glasses. Why the newspapers of the era devoted more space to a bandy-legged undersized horse than to Hitler and Theodore Roosevelt combined still boggles the imagination.

Imagine our news media today devoting less coverage to war, pestilence and genocide to focus on the heroics of a horse or some impossible childhood dream.

Hope is the most virulent strain of American viruses, but oh-so-easily cured by the latest sound bite on suicide bombers, the war on AIDS or the latest statistics regarding world hunger.

That the movie's release fuels the hopes and dreams of tens of thousands of racetrackers across these United States (whose livelihoods may ultimately depend upon its impact on the American sports psyche) is another disheartening trend.

With the recurring nightmare that saddles the racing industry to unjust gaming statutes both local and national, don't these people know when they're licked?

All this hoopla generated by a dead horse and old memories of a match race with Triple Crown-winner War Admiral is a conundrum of epic proportion.

The scariest part of this movie is that it will appeal to grade-school kids, teenagers (who wanna see what Spiderman looks like in the flesh) and even young tykes still riding wooden ponies.

In fact, except for the virtual wild ride that Dreamworks engineered with helmet cameras that boots audiences toward some mythic finish line aboard a streaking thoroughbred for the first time in motion-picture history, the P in this PG rated movie escapes me.

Even my great (though hard of hearing) granny wants two bucks across on the 'Biscuit.

I told her the horse was deceased.

"The horse ain't dead, you idiot," she screamed. "Look, he's right there on the TV screen!"

I give up. I'm going down to Emerald and laying six bucks across on the 'Biscuit. Then I'm going back to the movie theatre to watch the part where the young jockey, Pollard, walks through a sun-dappled field reading poetry to his horse.

That's a beautiful scene.

Once hope interfaces with media spin, you can't beat it to death with a pony on a stick.

See you at the movies -- reality TV just isn't my bag.

Larry Lee Palmer is a Seattle resident and the P-I's handicapper. He can be reached at sports@seattlepi.com


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: moviereview; seabiscuit
I saw this film tonight. It was GREAT! The entire case was excellent. Tobey Maguire moved upwards towards real stardom in this role as Red Pollard. By the way, he also was one of the films producers. If you are not moved by the story and thrilled by the racing scenes you do not have blood in your veins.

Oh -- the crowd applauded at the end of the movie. It has been a while since I was in a theater where people were that moved emotionally.

1 posted on 07/26/2003 12:07:53 AM PDT by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
"Oh -- the crowd applauded at the end of the movie"

Great! Great! I love it when that happens!
2 posted on 07/26/2003 12:19:30 AM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Visiting the track for the first time at age 50, I bet on a longshot named "Fizzy". It was my first bet.

The horse won. I won around 300 dollars.

It was very exciting. Cha Ching!

Now, I'm down about a grand.

3 posted on 07/26/2003 12:21:28 AM PDT by battlegearboat (Contribute to the "Tagline Museum Fund")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat
In 1994, I took a date to Santa Anita for the Big Race. Before we went over to the track we had a drink at watering hole in Glendale. The bartender was a big horse racing fan. He whispered to us to be sure and bet heavily on this horse. Think its name was 'Deep Purple.' Well we watched the race from the jockey club and had a lot of fun. In the seventh race my lady friend put down $ 50 on the horse. The horse came in and paid 20/1.

Funny thing was she was yelling and screaming and everybody around us was quiet. They looked rally upset that she won.

4 posted on 07/26/2003 12:32:07 AM PDT by ex-Texan (My tag line is broken !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: battlegearboat
They did that to me too at Jai Alai some years ago. Now I don't gamble.

Not even a cent.

HOw do they know... ;-)

5 posted on 07/26/2003 12:34:37 AM PDT by Bon mots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Good movie, yet I could have done without the attempt at rewriting history in favor of FDR. Same ole' claptrap, FDR saved the world from the recession nonsense...Other than that, good wholesome movie with an underdog appeal.
6 posted on 07/26/2003 12:46:06 AM PDT by Outraged
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
bump
7 posted on 07/26/2003 2:56:25 AM PDT by lowbridge (Rob: "I see a five letter word. F-R-E-E-P. Freep." Jerry: "Freep? What's that?" - Dick Van Dyke Show)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
See my positive review here and some comments by other Freepers:

Seabiscuit Reviews (please post your comments about the movie)

8 posted on 07/26/2003 5:47:25 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Outraged
Same ole' claptrap, FDR saved the world from the recession nonsense

I got that impression initially, but there was a disclaimer later. Something like it wasn't the jobs that gave people hope and a future, it was belief in themselves and courage to pursue their dreams. It also mentioned the myth that scores of people committed suicide on Black Friday in 1929. That did not happen.

9 posted on 07/26/2003 5:54:29 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Outraged
> Same ole' claptrap, FDR saved the world from the recession nonsense...

There was a brief scene where the narrator said that the depression era public works programs meant that someone, finally cared. Then they showed a pic of FDR.

I'm surprised they didnt give it a PG-13...taking Jesus's name in vain twice, the scene with the prostitute.

10 posted on 07/26/2003 10:34:02 AM PDT by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
The movie dares to suggest that hope can conquer hype, pedigree, insurmountable odds, and whatever else you got, mister.

(sarcasm) Kind of like Free Republic...

11 posted on 07/26/2003 10:43:15 AM PDT by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
For the record, there was no "Black Friday" in 1929. The market dropped dramatically (by about 10%) on October 24, 1929, a Thursday, basically treaded water Firday and Monday and then on Tuesday October 29, 1929 the Market "Crashed" dropping 12% in one day.

That was not the largest drop in Market history, that occurred on October 19, 1987 when the Market dopped a stunning 500+ points about 22% in one day.

Most people still believe that the Market "Crash" of 1929 brought about the Depression. But if that is the case why did the much larger "Crash" in 1987 not bring about a similar Depression?

Could it have been the difference in Government action, primarily the difference between FDR's and Reagan's philosophies? But that's a story for another time and thread.
12 posted on 07/26/2003 10:45:07 AM PDT by AndyMeyers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
If it made George W. Bush cry I'm going to see it. It must be about character and integrity, two movie subjects that always make me a little misty-eyed.
13 posted on 07/26/2003 10:48:33 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AndyMeyers
But if that is the case why did the much larger "Crash" in 1987 not bring about a similar Depression?

Buying on margin was 10% then, now it's 50%. That's your answer.

14 posted on 07/26/2003 10:52:24 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
More than that. It was about self-made men. It was about decent men trying to do the right thing. It was about men taking chances on people they knew and had learned to respect. It was about true values. It was about another era: 1930's America.
15 posted on 07/26/2003 11:05:16 AM PDT by ex-Texan (My tag line is broken !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
I'm unsure how margin requirement of 10% vs. 50% brought about the Depression of the 1930's.

According to E.F. Hutton, who became famous for "calling" the Oct. 1929 "Crash", he saw trouble for the Market when it became clear that the Smoot/Hawley Tariffs had sufficient support to pass and President Hoover had said if Congress passed the Tariffs he would sign the legislation. The Smoot/Hawley Tariffs were protectionist tariffs that invited retalitory protectionist tariffs by Europe.

Commerce came to an abrupt halt and FDR responded by raising taxes, devaluing the dollar, effectively taking the U.S. off the gold standard, passing legislation to try and protect jobs and enacting a minimum wage at a time when all of the companies on the New York Stock Exchange were losing a cumulative $100 million a year (equivalent to about $2.5 billion today). And people wonder why unemployment went to 25%. For the record the unemployment in 1937, after all of FDR's "do-good" efforts was higher then in 1931, two years after the "Crash" and the beginning of the Depression, which was really a Contraction.

Your Federal Govenment, "showing it cared and doing something about the problem" caused the Depression (Contraction) of the 1930's with its asinine policies.




16 posted on 07/26/2003 11:21:23 AM PDT by AndyMeyers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AndyMeyers
I'm unsure how margin requirement of 10% vs. 50% brought about the Depression of the 1930's.

There was much more speculating done on 10% margin requirements which meant there were many more “players” involved in the market. Margin calls on 90% of the stock’s value hit a much larger percentage of investors than in 87 and at significantly higher rate. 90% margin calls bankrupted nearly everyone, companies went out of business due to lack of capital and that put a lot of people on the street at the same time. That’s what happened.

17 posted on 07/26/2003 11:50:04 AM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks
I'm see that you draw the same conclusion as others have, that the "Crash" caused the Depression.

The "Crash" of 1987 was much greater than the "Crash" of 1929. No Depression or Contraction followed the 1987 "Crash".

There was no cause and effect between the "Crash" of 1929 and the Depression.

Companies do not go broke because individual investors in the stock market lose money. If they did, why did we not have a rash of companies going broke after the 1987 "Crash"?

Reread my previous post. The Depression (Contraction) was caused by the federal government implementing the wrong policies. FDR then used the crisis caused by the federal government to greatly expand the powers and reach of the federal government. History now tells us that there were a significant number of Communists in FDR's administration and that they pushed for the "socialists" policies of FDR's reign.

If one believes that our country's founders created a government of limited powers to guarantee rights and freedom of the people, than you have to conclude that FDR was the worst President we have ever had, including Clinton, Johnson and Nixon.

Although our Constitution cites Property Rights twice, once in the 5th Amendment and again in the 14th, FDR's policies and those of almost every Democrat President since FDR have been an assult on Property Rights, which are the foundation of a free people.
18 posted on 07/26/2003 8:38:07 PM PDT by AndyMeyers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson