[Mr. K]

dems are not used to this- they were allowed to do this with impunity before...

only republicans were stopped

[HenryLeeII]

"You would think a man in his [Terry McAullife] position would know the difference between a local affiliate and a national news network," she said.

No, I think McAullife is lucky that he can breathe and blink...

[Only1choice____Freedom]

DNC Chairman Terry McAuliffe responded with an attack on the decision to not run the ad: "Apparently Fox has changed its slogan from 'We report, you decide' to 'we let Bush decide what we air.'"

Only in the demented mind of a Democrat is a paid polical ad defined as reporting.

Who does he think he's fooling? Just the fact he is talking about a FOX ad means he is already missing his target audience.

[ChadGore]

Wooohooo ! Power to the people! They can't buy lies!

[rwfromkansas]

""You would think a man in his position would know the difference between a local affiliate and a national news network," she said."

What a woman! That was a nice shot Irena!

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Hey McAuliffe - this is a local FOX station. "We Report, You Decide" is the slogan of the FOX News Network. They are not affiliated.

Idiot!

[thoughtomator]

I just sent them a glowing congratulations letter =)

[thoughtomator]

FYI their email is comments@fox47.com.

This is a LANDMARK moment for the media industry!

[KellyAdmirer]

Leaving off a part of the President's sentence is intentionally misleading and untruthful. Any station in the US using public airwaves that airs that sort of thing should have its license put into question.

[Yo-Yo]

...making the now-disavowed statement about Saddam Hussein seeking uranium from Africa for a nuclear weapons program.

Wasn't that Tony Blair up on Capitol Hill last week saying that the British Government stood behind that report?

[kevao]

How come we never made a similar ad with Clinton, you know:

"I did [omitted] have sex with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky."

[jagrmeister]

My take on this: TV stations have a responsibility to their viewers to ensure that the advertisements they broadcast are not designed to mislead (false advertising). To do otherwise would be to sever the trust between the station and its viewers. To this end, a station must have standards and the DNC ad, designed to mislead and containing multiple lies, did not measure up. The DNC is always free to re-release an ad which is not designed to mislead and it may have better success in getting it broadcasted. But it is up to the DNC to raise their standards, not to compel tv affiliates to lower theirs.

[L.N. Smithee]

Fox spokeswoman Irena Steffen in New York said the decision was not made at the national level. "You would think a man in his position would know the difference between a local affiliate and a national news network," she said.

McAuliffe knows. People who are NOT "in his position" don't necessarily know the difference. Those people will be fooled by McAuliffe's portrayal of this as Fox News Channel bias.

[Osage Orange]

If truth in advertising laws were applied to political advertisment....there wouldn't be any.

Ummmmmmm....maybe there's something to that..!! :)

Fwiw---

[supercat]

I remember when WMSN became Madison's fifth television station (and the first that wasn't a multiple of 3 but not 6--the first four were 3, 15, 21, and 27, but WMSN was 47--a pretty big crank from everyone else on the rotary tuner). Back then I think they were struggling for advertisers because they would sometimes run the same ad for "Circus Fun" cereal twice in a row. Actually, WMSN's entry into the market was probably pretty well-timed, since Fox came into being very shortly afterward.

BTW, can any Wisconsin FReepers tell me what Mad City's current TV lineup is? Are all of the first five still in the roles I rememember (CBS-3 NBC-15 PBS-21 ABC-27 Ind/Fox-47)?

[rintense]

Send an email to the station to thank them for having some ethics- and practicing them.