You must have not read his first paragraph in #161. I don't think that poster has drawn any conclusions.
I did read his first paragraph. And, yes, he did note that what he was presenting was inconclusive. My message was meant to be address to "All" (my bad) and to illustrate how ridiculous this whole debate is (on both sides).
A litany of "evidence" introduced by passive phrases like "There have been reports that" is no basis for drawing conclusions. It's all bogus as far as I'm concerned. Let's wait and see what evidence is presented at trial.