Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Physicists Build World's Smallest Motor Using Nanotubes And Etched Silicon
Science Daily ^ | 7/24/03

Posted on 07/24/2003 2:00:32 PM PDT by LibWhacker

BERKELEY – Only 15 years after University of California, Berkeley, engineers built the first micro-scale motor, a UC Berkeley physicist has created the first nano-scale motor - a gold rotor on a nanotube shaft that could ride on the back of a virus.

"It's the smallest synthetic motor that's ever been made," said Alex Zettl, professor of physics at UC Berkeley and faculty scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. "Nature is still a little bit ahead of us - there are biological motors that are equal or slightly smaller in size - but we are catching up."

Zettl and his UC Berkeley graduate students and post-docs report their feat in the July 24 issue of Nature.

The electrostatic motors represent a milestone in nanotechnology, and prove that nanotubes and other nanostructures several hundred times smaller than the diameter of a human hair can be manipulated and assembled into true devices.

Zettl and other scientists had previously made transistors from nanotubes, but this device is different, he said.

"It's the first device where you can put external wires on it and have something rotating, something you can control," he said. "We are pushing a lot of different technologies to the edge."

Such motors could have numerous uses, Zettl said. Because the rotor can be positioned at any angle, the motor could be used in optical circuits to redirect light, a process called optical switching. The rotor could be rapidly flipped back and forth to create a microwave oscillator, or the spinning rotor could be used to mix liquids in microfluidic devices.

The motor is about 500 nanometers across, 300 times smaller than the diameter of a human hair. While the part that rotates, the rotor, is between 100 and 300 nanometers long, the carbon nanotube shaft to which it is attached is only a few atoms across, perhaps 5-10 nanometers thick.

In 1988, UC Berkeley electrical engineering professor Richard Muller and colleagues in the Berkeley Sensor & Actuator Center (BSAC) fabricated from silicon the world's first operating micromotor. Their electrostatic motor was 100 microns across, or about the width of a human hair.

While the microelectromechanical system (MEMS) motor still awaits appreciable industrial application, Muller said, other actuated MEMS devices have become commonplace. MEMS accelerometers, in part based on micromachining technology developed in BSAC, are now used in almost all automobile airbag deployment systems and in many heart pacemakers. MEMS micromirror arrays are vying with liquid-crystal arrays in state-of-the-art display projectors.

"Even at the time of its invention, the micromotor was more a demonstration that designers had the sophistication to produce actuated mechanisms of micrometer size," said Muller, now a Professor in the Graduate School at UC Berkeley. "Similarly, Professor Zettl's achievement demonstrates controlled nanometer actuation, which opens a new realm for controlled manipulations. Right now, some applications appear to be significant for interactions with similarly sized biological specimens, and that's very exciting."

"Rich Muller has been a true inspiration for us. He did a fantastic thing," Zettl said. "When I look at his original motor, it's a work of art, it's very beautiful. But it looks huge to me now.

"We are trying to use some of the pioneering ideas that he and his collaborators had back then, but clearly this is a new phenomenon."

One unexpected difficulty, for example, is that the techniques for measuring the motor's speed are as yet too crude. The team's scanning electron microscope (SEM) can take pictures every 33 milliseconds and no faster, so they can't tell whether the rotor spins or flips faster than 30 times per second.

"We assume you could go much, much faster than that, probably to microwave frequencies," Zettl said. "There's no way we can detect that right now, but in principle the motor should be able to run that fast."

Microwave frequencies, common in communication networks, are above a billion cycles per second, in the gigahertz frequency range.

The motor's shaft is a multiwalled nanotube, that is, it consists of nested nanotubes much like the layers of a leek. Annealed both to the rotor and fixed anchors, the rigid nanotube allows the rotor to move only about 20 degrees. However, the team was able to break the outer wall of the nested nanotubes to allow the outer tube and attached rotor to freely spin around the inner tubes as a nearly frictionless bearing.

To build the motor, Zettl and his team made a slew of multiwalled nanotubes in an electric arc and deposited them on the flat silicon oxide surface of a silicon wafer. They then identified the best from the pile with an atomic force microscope, a device capable of picking up single atoms.

A gold rotor, nanotube anchors and opposing stators were then simultaneously patterned around the chosen nanotubes using electron beam lithography. A third stator was already buried under the silicon oxide surface. The rotor was annealed to the nanotubes and then the surface selectively etched to provide sufficient clearance for the rotor.

When the stators were charged with up to 50 volts of direct current, the gold rotor deflected up to 20 degrees, which was visible in the SEM. With alternating voltage, the rotor rocked back and forth, acting as a torsional oscillator. Such an oscillator, probably capable of microwave frequency oscillations from hundreds of megahertz to gigahertz, could be useful in many types of devices - in particular, communications devices such as cell phones or computers.

With a strong electrical jolt to the stators, the team was able to jerk the rotor and break the outer wall of the nested nanotubes, allowing the rotor to spin freely on the nested nanotube bearings. Zettl had made similar bearings several years ago, but this was the first time he had put them to use.

"The real breakthrough came a couple of years ago, when we discovered a method for peeling shells off multiwalled nanotubes and grabbing the core with a homemade nano-manipulator operating inside a transmission electron microscope (TEM)," Zettl said. "We showed that you could pull out the cores and they really did slide, they really did behave as a bearing. That technological leap allowed us to go full bore on the motor and really have confidence we could make it in the laboratory."

Interestingly, the rotor does not continue spinning for long once the electricity is turned off. It is so small that it has little inertia, so any tiny electric charges remaining on the device after it's turned off tend to stop the rotor immediately.

"The nanoworld is weird - different things dominate," Zettl said. "Gravity plays no role whatsoever and inertial effects are basically nonexistent because things are just so small, so that little things like residual electric fields can play a dominant role. It's counter intuitive."

Zettl expects to be able to reduce the size even further, perhaps by a factor of five. For the moment, though, he and his team are trying to make basic quantum measurements, such as the conductance through the nanotubes and the amount of friction in the bearings.

"There are many very fundamental questions we are trying to answer," he said. "The flip side is, we've got this incredibly neat little motor that's smaller than any other electric motor - let's try to integrate it into some larger architecture where people are making microelectromechanical devices or nanoelectromechnical devices. People will build on this."

Zettl's collaborators on the paper are graduate students A. M. Fennimore, T. D. Yuzvinsky and John Cumings and post-docs Wei-Qiang Han and M. S Fuhrer. Fuhrer now is with the Department of Physics at the University of Maryland, College Park. Cumings is now with the Department of Physics at Stanford University.

The work is supported by the National Science Foundation and the Office of Energy Research of the U.S. Department of Energy.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: motor; nanotubes; physicists; smallest
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last
To: .30Carbine
(To Maxwell:} You were involved in this, weren't you

Not directly, but his daemon was.

41 posted on 07/24/2003 3:55:31 PM PDT by Erasmus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: .30Carbine
Nyuk nyuk nyuk... MEMS is always groovy.

On a completely unrelated note, have you ever seen this site, Objective: Christian Ministries? My bud told me about it, he looked at the "Creationist Science Fair" stuff and thought that it was a real site. He laughed fit to split. Projects like "My uncle is a man named Steve, not a monkey" and other foolishness.
Well I looked through it and have determined that this site is probably made by the same person(s) who did Landover Baptist, a Christian-parody site.
Thing is, folks like my bud-- well-educated and all that-- will look at this "Objective" site and think that it is legit. Well it ain't. There are some whack-job "Christians" out there but this ain't one of 'em.

42 posted on 07/24/2003 4:51:21 PM PDT by maxwell (That's DOCTOR Max to YOU, bud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Future Snake Eater
I'm assuming this thing can break down. How do you fix it if it does?

Build a new one.

I imagine the ideal situation would involve a statistical basis-- have enough motors in place that the percentage of those that break down won't affect the completion of the overall job process... To within standard deviations...

43 posted on 07/24/2003 5:05:09 PM PDT by maxwell (That's DOCTOR Max to YOU, bud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: yall
Silicon Valley based MEMS engineer available for hire.

FReep mail me for a copy of my résumé...
44 posted on 07/24/2003 5:14:10 PM PDT by null and void (SOON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: TAP ONLINE
Famous Futurist Succumbs to Mystery Virus, Laboratory Found Empty.
45 posted on 07/24/2003 5:31:22 PM PDT by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: maxwell
Never saw the site you mention, Dr. max.

It will never cease to amaze me how otherwise intelligent people will base their decisions on feelings and myth rather than logic and evidence, i.e., science. It was not always so. I am constantly delighted to find quotes from (once-)famous brilliant scientists defending the God of Creation and giving Him glory for the incredible discoveries they made.

Here are only a few examples:

Sir David Brewster, Scottish physicist: "I shall see Jesus, and that will be grand!...Oh, is it not sad that all are not contented with the beautiful simple plan of salvation - Jesus Christ only - who has done so much for us."

Sir John Frederick Hershel, English astronomer: "All human discoveries seem to be made only for the purpose of confirming more and more strongly the truths that come from on high and are contained in the Sacred Writings."

John Ray, considered the father of English natural history, expert in the fields of botany and zoology: "The Wisdom of God Manifested in the Works of Creation" is the title of one of his books.

Samuel F. B. Morse, American inventor: "The nearer I approach to the end of my pilgrimage, the clearer is the evidence of the divine origin of the Bible, the grandeur and sublimity of God's remedy for fallen man...."

Blaise Pascal, 'Father of the Science of Hydrostatics': "How can anyone lose who chooses to become a Christian? If, when he dies, there turns out to be no God and his faith was in vain, he has lost nothing - in fact, he has been happier in life than his nonbelieving friends. If, however, there is a God and heaven and hell, then he has gained heaven and his skeptical friends will have lost everything in hell!"

Louis Pasteur, French scientist who developed the process of pasteurization for milk, as well as many vacines: "The more I study nature, the more I stand amazed at the work of the Creator. Into his tiniest creatures, God has placed extraordinay properties."

Johann Depler, founder of physical astronomy, discovered the laws governing planetary motion: "I thank Thee, my Creator and Lord, that Thou hast given me this joy in Thy creation, this delight in the works of Thy hands; I have shown the excellency of Thy works unto man, so far as my finite mind was able to comprehend Thine infinity...."

Sir Isaac Newton, discovered the laws of gravity, developed calculus: "There is one God, the Father, ever-living, omnipresent, omniscient, almighty, the Maker of heaven and earth, and one Mediator between God and man, the man Christ Jesus."

Robert Morris Page, invented pulsation radar: "One of the great evidences [of the Bible's authenticity] is the long series of prophecies concerning Jesus the Messiah. These prophecies extend hundreds of years prior to the birth of Christ. They include a vast amount of detail concerning Christ himself, His nature and the things He would do when He came."

Sir James Young Simpson, pioneered modern anesthesiology through his discovery of chloroform [stated that his research was inspired by the 'deep sleep' that Adam was put into]: "I looked and saw Jesus, my substitute, scourged in my stead and dying on the cross for me. I looked and cried and was forgiven. And it seems to be my duty to tell you of that Saviour, to see if you will not also look and live."

Andre Marie Ampere, French scientific writer, discovered the relationship between magnetism and electricity: "Believe in God, in His providence, in a future life, in the recompense of the good; in the punishment of the wicked; in the sublimity and truth of the doctrines of Christ, in a revelation of this doctrine by a special divine inspiration for the salvation of the human race."

Charles Milton Stine, director of research for the E. I. Dupont Company: "The world about us, far more intricate than any watch, filled with checks and balances of a hundred varieties, marvelous beyond even the imagination of the most skilled scientific investigator, this beautiful and intricate creation, bears the signature of its Creator, graven in its works."

Credit to William J. Federer for compiling these quotes in America's God and Country.

46 posted on 07/25/2003 3:57:08 AM PDT by .30Carbine (don't get me going)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: .30Carbine
Well my creationist-leaning views ain't popular with my colleagues, but in the kind of science I study the topic never comes up. Because it's real science: the observation and measurement of current physical phenomena, here and now. Not extrapolation in time, not calculations the verity of which have limited "testability".

I can't explain to my colleagues why I believe as I do, and they can't offer me anything more about their views. Religion is like that. And yes I do classify evolutionary theory as a religion.

The reason that sites like the one I showed you p!ss me off so much is, folks look at that and think "so this foolishness is what the creationists are up to". Very insidious effort on the part of the dude who put that site together.

47 posted on 07/25/2003 9:13:18 AM PDT by maxwell (That's DOCTOR Max to YOU, bud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: maxwell; .30Carbine
Truth is truth.

I expect Science and Religion to converge, as they both are seeking ultimate answers.

I don't think either side knows where the quest will end, and I suspect the answers will be things that neither side would recognize as it's own today.
48 posted on 07/25/2003 9:29:13 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Now why in hel* would someone want to make a motor to ride on the back of a virus?
49 posted on 07/25/2003 11:04:46 AM PDT by Imnidiot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imnidiot
"What use is a new born baby?" - Michael Farady on the electromagnet, after being asked by a Prince, "What good is it?"
50 posted on 07/25/2003 11:12:15 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Imnidiot
Suppose one put a couple trillion of them on the skin of an airplane or hull of a ship?

I can see this as a very quiet, robust, low IR signature form of propulsion for aircraft. I live near the glide path for San Jose Mineta International Airport, quiet is good!

Perhaps by having the motors properly tuned they could reduce or eliminate sonic booms. That would allow supersonic transcontinental (as opposed to limited to transoceanic) transport.

On shipboard applications the motors would provide propulsion and act as an antifouling coating, reducing toxic chemical usage.

Or maybe a coating for the inside of blood vessels? A whole system heart replacement?

Or self pumping aquaducts.

Or...
51 posted on 07/25/2003 11:22:43 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

52 posted on 07/25/2003 11:37:19 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Here's to Hillary's book sinking like the Clinton 2000 economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer
Inverse compensation, "for sompin".
53 posted on 07/25/2003 11:38:51 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrisssssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker

54 posted on 07/25/2003 11:41:38 AM PDT by bmwcyle (Here's to Hillary's book sinking like the Clinton 2000 economy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Physicists Build World's Smallest Motor Using Nanotubes And Etched Silicon

Smaller than the motor in a Yugo?

Are they sure?

55 posted on 07/25/2003 11:42:21 AM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
It gives new meaning to the ol' "if your brain was converted to gasoline, there wouldn't be enough to fuel a motor the size of a virus" thing.
56 posted on 07/25/2003 11:46:13 AM PDT by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary. You have the right to be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-56 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson