To: Flying Circus
Don't know you. In spite of your foolish, baseless, ignorant comment, you get one try.
Could you "win the argument" with James Carville about whether or not Bill Clinton was a wonderful, superb president who should not have been impeached — win it in his eyes, and in the eyes of an audience full of Lanny Davises and Eleanor Clifts? If so, how? If not, why not?
Think before you write this time. Answer directly and honestly, or please don't bother.
Dan
140 posted on
07/24/2003 6:13:49 PM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: Flying Circus
PS -- I suspect you're not up to it. Prove me wrong about that, though! I'd love you to!
Dan
143 posted on
07/24/2003 6:22:24 PM PDT by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: BibChr
If the crowd was composed only of Lanny Davis and Eleanor Clifts, then I wouldn't bother attending. But this is an open forum with easy as many contributers with a Protestant outlook as there are Catholics.
When a person storms out of the room refusing to continue discussions with somone they had been having a civil debate with, anyone who was listening is free and likely to assume that they lost and couldn't defend their view.
144 posted on
07/24/2003 6:29:16 PM PDT by
Flying Circus
(orthodoxy requires orthopraxy)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson