[Don Corleone]

Isn't it interesting that we could have smoked 'em out with tear gas...but that is against the law (international) so we had to blast 'em. Law of unintended consequences at work once again. Don't you just love it there, libs?

[Sacajaweau]

I liked the way it turned out! Dead is good in this case.

[Lonesome in Massachussets]

Isn't it interesting that we could have smoked 'em out with tear gas...but that is against the law (international) so we had to blast 'em.

We had the same problem in the Pacific during WW-II. Japs would hole up in caves. TNT and napalm were ok, but tear gas was illegal.

[HenryLeeII]

Oh no! This was pre-meditated murder according to such luminaries as Howard Dean and Charles RangelYourMoneyAwayFromYou. I'd love to see the Dem's try to make this an issue...

[Pearls Before Swine]

Isn't it interesting that we could have smoked 'em out with tear gas...but that is against the law (international)

Glad you pointed that out. I was scratching my head wondering why they didn't use some teargas, myself. Interesting that nonlethal teargas is "against international law" but leveling the place with heavy weapons is OK.

[El Gato]

Isn't it interesting that we could have smoked 'em out with tear gas...,

I doubt it would have worked, they might have had masks and if not, they would have eaten their pistols, as one did anyway, rather than surrendering.

[Monty22]

Sorry for the double post..

I'm so angry at the leftists, and happy these two are dead I'm almost jumping in my seat.

But yes, it's so ironic that the 'rules of war' demands that they shoot up the place.. With full metal jacket bullets of course.