To: Polycarp
The problem is Poly, that your definition of a pro-homo activist is anyone who isn't on FR every day actively denouncing gays as perverted child molesters, perhaps someone who might give the slightest hesitant pause before shipping them off to concentration camps in the desert.
When said pro-homo activist expresses their opinion that maybe gays could possibly co-exist with others in a multi-faceted nation, and that maybe a desert exile is a troublesome proposition in a nation where people are supposed to have individual rights, you go running to the Admin Moderator to have them banned as liberal infiltrators.
49 posted on
07/23/2003 3:25:58 PM PDT by
tdadams
To: tdadams
Amen.
I don't get the point of what this thread was supposed to be, of course, but I'm a conservative who thinks the goverment has no business policing what occurs between adults in the privacy of their households, so long as minor children are absolutely not involved. I'd just as soon see tax laws changed to define households as two adults who comingle their finances and cohabit with or without dependants, whether they are gay, simply unmarried, mother and adult child, or someone's old maiden aunts, whatever.
I'm a fiscal conservative, and I believe that wanting the government out of family life is being a social conservative, too. I wish people would stop going on witchhunts. If you don't want to hang out with obnoxious gay activists, they seem quite easy to avoid. Most gay people I've known live normal, quiet, lives, and vote Republican. Come to put *them* in camps, and I will have to stand with them, because that's not what America is.
So put me down as someone who thinks that getting government out of the marriage licensing business altogether is a better idea than just extending the current definition. Let marriage be a matter of property law and religion, as it should be. Why should the state have any say in it at all?
60 posted on
07/23/2003 3:55:28 PM PDT by
ChemistCat
(Transformers look just as good by morning light as they did the night before.)
To: tdadams
The problem is Poly, that your definition of a pro-homo activist is anyone who isn't on FR every day actively denouncing gays as perverted child molesters, perhaps someone who might give the slightest hesitant pause before shipping them off to concentration camps in the desert. Liar Liar pants on fire!!! Hyperbole, beyond the pale strawman arguments!! tdadams, you LIE!!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson