Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
Or perhaps the metal detectors are a visible but non-functional deterrent. I used to work in a highly-visited public building in which the metal detectors were not operating because that would cost too much money, but were left in the entrance area as a visual deterrent.
360 posted on 07/23/2003 12:45:40 PM PDT by HenryLeeII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]


To: HenryLeeII
Fox News is reporting that the shooter may have had some sort of clearance to bring in a gun or used a private entrance that did not have magnometres.
371 posted on 07/23/2003 12:48:07 PM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs (Your request is not unlike your lower intestine. Stinky and full of danger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

To: HenryLeeII
Or perhaps the metal detectors are a visible but non-functional deterrent.

Don't be surprised if the gunman worked at City Hall and /or was one of the few people in NYC allowed to legally carry a gun. If he worked in the building, security may have waived him in without security screening. In fact, I seem to recall a seperate entrance where city employees with proper ID are allowed to enter the buiding without having to go through the metal detector. If he had any political clout, then there is also a chance that he may have had a carry permit, because liberal politcols and famous people apparently have a greater need for a gun that the average Joe < /sarcasm >.

398 posted on 07/23/2003 12:54:30 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson