GEPHARDT DOES ABOUT FACE

Republican National Committee ^ | July 23, 2003 | RNC Research

[PhiKapMom]

Looks Gephardt has caught Goreitis -- Reinventing Yourself to Suit the Moment!

[mhking]

Wait! I thought Geppy had two faces!

[PhiKapMom]

Please keep this for your records to counter the attacks and lies by Gephardt and the willing DemocRAT Media puppets!

BUSH + CHENEY = VICTORY '04

[Mo1]

They are all trying to be like Dean

[dead]

Nice work from the RNC.

Whoever put this together deserves a promotion.

[laweeks]

I don't care if he has two faces; I just wonder where his eyebrows are. Most wooden-headed puppets have eyebrows.

[onyx]

He'll not be Mr. Speaker in the foreseeable future, and he will NEVER be POTUS!

He's a combination of baffoon and goon, a truly vile whiner.

[onyx]

ROFLMBO!!

[annyokie]

Thanks for the ping, Mom!

[Dusty Rose]

He will run into himself coming and going. Democrat choice for the Presidential run in 2004 he will not be.

[Mr. Silverback]

They are all trying to be like Dean

Bingo. They're looking at Dean's dollars, his poll jump in New Hamster, etc., and they want what he's got. Also, I'm noticing that among the local leftists, the dividing line is between the real loonballs (Kucinich supporters waxing googly-eyed over the Department of Peace) and the majority, who are salivating over a Dean-Bush match. Nobody cares about Gephardt or Edwards, and those who like Kerry mainly like him for Theresa's money, not his politics or personality (or lack thereof).

The defining issue for the Dems right now is the war. The Dem activists hated the war and hate our success even more. Any Dem who doesn't bash Bush on this issue might as well give up on even the possibility of getting the VP nomination.

[Mr. Silverback]

Nice work from the RNC. Whoever put this together deserves a promotion.

I'll second that. Heck, they probably had it waiting already; Gephardt changed his views on baby-killing for political expediency, why not change his views on Saddam-killing for the same reason?

[Mo1]

The defining issue for the Dems right now is the war. The Dem activists hated the war and hate our success even more. Any Dem who doesn't bash Bush on this issue might as well give up on even the possibility of getting the VP nomination.

Yep and Dean will say anything they want him to say.

They haven't realized that Dean is a dolt and couldn't debate himself out of paper bag.

[Fawnn]

Once again Gephardt has shown us the difference between somebody who only knows how to react (or over-react) and someone who knows how to be a leader.

A leader chooses his battles wisely. And, while not compromising his personal values, is then as partisan as it takes to get the job done.

Daily the Dims are demonstrating they don't have a grasp on how to lead effectively in today's world. For so many years they got so comfy handing out so many entitlements that kept them in enough voters to continue to keep them in power that they also just don't know how to behave now that their power is slipping away. (Well, handing out entitlements and beer and cigarettes, but I won't go there.... <-- I just used a Dim MO.)

The Dims only know how to whine. They don't talk about solutions because they're clueless about how to come up with them because none of their ideas work. And that's what truly saddens them.

[thegreatbeast]

Besides the politics of it, there is no sense in funding the old intelligence infrastructure the same old way. The FBI and the CIA suck and need to be changed big time. I thought that was what was on the table when we established the Homeland Security Secretariate. One of its prime directives was to integrate internal and external intelligence functions into something that works. If we go blithely along with the old models, we are going to get the same results.

[PhiKapMom]

LOL!!!!!!! Look like he has those two faces now!

[BlessedByLiberty]

Great analysis. I suggest that everytime one of the liberals appears on Hissy Matthews, Hannity & Clueless, erc., that the host ask direct questions. No more, you're a great friend of this show, crud.

Ask them:

You do not support this war, so what is your solution? Are you ready to abandon Iraq and bring the troops home right now? Are you ready to accept the consequences of such an action?

What is your solution to: North Korea? Middle East? Economy?
Windmills in Posh LIb Enclaves?

Then Demand Specifics, no rhetorical answers accepted. Press them for an answer.

I'm so tired of conservatives not pressing them. Hannity was great when he got fire in his eye and pressed Kennedy on his use of a private jet. Then he relents on people like Rengel.

[ClancyJ]

Apparently all the comments about not trusting the Democrats with the safety of America are sinking in. Trying to backtrack now and be pro-defense, pro-protection of America.

Yet, daily - as with Charlie Rangel - we are given insight into how the Democrats feel about defense, about protecting American interests and where the power of the U.S. must be administered. They believe the U.N. - not America should make decisions about how America defends herself.

No, the Democrats have shown their true selves - they are internationalists who want to give away the defense, the control, the power of this great land and let dictators, human rights abusers and third world countries be in charge of the power of America.

[Fawnn]

Windmills in Posh LIb Enclaves?

You show no mercy, do you!? ;)

I'm so tired of conservatives not pressing them.

Agreed! I get frustrated by how many doublespeak distortions most of those show hosts let slide.