To: Dane
We lost 3,000 people on 9/11/01, due to our lack of focusing on the Middle East. Correction -- We lost 3,000 people on 9/11/01 due to our lack of focusing on the United States.
Any U.S. response to 9/11 that does not include the sacking of every incompetent bureaucrat in the FBI, CIA, INS, etc. is both inadequate and misdirected.
To: Alberta's Child
Correction -- We lost 3,000 people on 9/11/01 due to our lack of focusing on the United States. Any U.S. response to 9/11 that does not include the sacking of every incompetent bureaucrat in the FBI, CIA, INS, etc. is both inadequate and misdirected.
So basically what you are saying is that there is no danger of any radical islamic or radical dictatorship in the Middle East developing WMD.
Am I right?
28 posted on
07/23/2003 9:51:39 AM PDT by
Dane
To: Alberta's Child
We lost 3,000 people on 9/11/01 due to our lack of focusing on the United StatesHow so? How would focusing on the United States prevented bin Laden's forces from attacking us again?
30 posted on
07/23/2003 9:52:36 AM PDT by
Catspaw
To: Alberta's Child
"Any U.S. response to 9/11 that does not include the sacking of every incompetent bureaucrat in the FBI, CIA, INS, etc. is both inadequate and misdirected."
Good luck with trying to sack a whole bunch of career employees! The US government is full of them, and they aint going nowhere!
58 posted on
07/23/2003 3:41:49 PM PDT by
Maria S
To: Alberta's Child
Any U.S. response to 9/11 that does not include the sacking of every incompetent bureaucrat in the FBI, CIA, INS, etc. is both inadequate and misdirected.OK.
How many "incompetent bureaucrats" are there in these organizations, total?
59 posted on
07/23/2003 3:42:45 PM PDT by
Poohbah
(Crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and hear the lamentations of their women.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson