Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Iwo Jima
One can see that the woman could easily feel that she was the victim of false pretenses which -- after she gives it some thought -- causes her to conclude that she really didn't consent to what happened and therefore it must have been rape.

In my mind, this is the most likely scenario. The girl either did not get as much (snuggling, a morning phone call,etc.) or more (anal penetration, rough handling)than she bargained for.

437 posted on 07/22/2003 4:07:09 PM PDT by Zevonismymuse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies ]


To: Zevonismymuse
In my mind, this is the most likely scenario. The girl either did not get as much (snuggling, a morning phone call,etc.) or more (anal penetration, rough handling)than she bargained for.

You left out rape.

454 posted on 07/22/2003 4:35:04 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies ]

To: Zevonismymuse
The girl either did not get as much (snuggling, a morning phone call,etc.) or more (anal penetration, rough handling)than she bargained for.

Are you contending that even if someone engages in consensual sex thinking it would be normal sex, that they can be forced to submit to anal sex?

I would have my husband charged if he did that to me (which of course he would never do).

And please note I am asking as a general contention, not saying this girl consented and then "got what was coming to her if he wanted anal sex", which I find a stunning and sick position that I've seen some here embrace.

487 posted on 07/22/2003 5:55:07 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson