Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AppyPappy
I believe her over him because he proved himself untrustworthy when he committed adultery.

And there's the rub. As wrong as it is, adultery is not a crime. This, because he admitted adultery, still does not prove sexual assault.

Yes, Bryant could be guilty of sexual assault. But at this moment, it's totally inconclusive. I think that people who think he's automatically innocent are off the reservation. But so are those who think he is guilty.

There is no way to tell.

223 posted on 07/22/2003 11:18:50 AM PDT by rdb3 (Nerve-racking since 0413hrs on XII-XXII-MCMLXXI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]


To: rdb3
Of course, there is no way to tell. But we all have our opinions. My opinion is that he did it. I don't think he will fry for it and it will provide me endless hours of entertainment watching feminists trying to ignore the case.
228 posted on 07/22/2003 11:20:18 AM PDT by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson