Posted on 07/22/2003 8:20:57 AM PDT by Smogger
I just saw it on MSNBC. They said she was at a party a week ago, 3 days before Kobe was charged.
They said she was drinking (consumption by a minor) and playing cards, and was bragging about.....(MSNBC took out the audio at the end of sentence)
The story was confirmed by 5 people at separate places and times who were at the party and all gave a similar account of what happened.
When asked how the girl looked, the guy interviewed said she looked happy. Everyone was shocked to see her at the party given the incident.
I think someone may have even asked how hung was Kobe upon which she described with hand gestures. She seemed to be bragging according to a friend, but said she couldn't tell them what happened that night.
This just keeps getting better and better...
What was a lie? I believe you are confused...again.
Your erratic responses must have been meant for another...go look.
You're a kook. Name what? One of her slutty friends? They've been all over the t.v.
Agree rdb3. And Appy, I saw your followup. Yes, this is a free country. People are free to be ignorant and to draw any conclusion they wish, even if they are baseless and drawn off of preconceived notions rather than examined facts.
But they are all pointing up towards heaven. Did they change their minds about who is guilty? Seems like they are blaming God for something now, right after attending church even!
Where. You are just making it up. No source, no credibility. Just another rumor smear.
Nope. You are the guilty party.
Have you never heard of a women getting raped?
Now you're wrong about Kobe AND a liar.
Sad, indeed.
Try the article at the top of THIS THREAD.
I saw the likes of y'all during the David Westerfield trial. Funny thing, those DW supporters are still out there with their story that the police set him up. Most of those out there searching for the killers of OJ's wife have gone home, though.
You didn't see me and I bet you were wrong and lying that time, too.
But you are emotionally attached to an opinion, so my point apparently flew right over your head. Had you dropped the defensiveness and considered it logically, rather than from an emotionally defensive position, you would have realized that my point can also be applied to those who rely on statements or actions of others to defend Kobe (like a reporter, defense attorney, etc.) while questioning the motives of the accuser.
The point of my question, if you read the post, was to call out those who base their conclusions on a false presumption that they understand the prosecutor's motive, while questioning that of all others in the case.
The primary point goes to both sides of the debate and my question can be applied to more than that of the prosecutor.
Slow down for a moment.
So you think DW was setup.
I then said, "Name what?"
How many conversations are you presently having.
You are confused on more than one front. Just keep on attacking like the thuggy Kobe.
Your childish and erratic postings no longer merit any consideration. Not sure when they did... Your torrent of worthless 1 sentence quibs and rants seek only to bring us all down to your deranged level.
Ok. I just see so many that claim to be neutral but always seem to find Kobe's side to illustrate. I jumped on you a too quick.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.