[Darksheare]

Names?
You don't know arabic?
I thought you'd know it since you support Sadman.

Just plug it into a translation proggy then.

ANd the evidence is there.
Re-read the FIRST HALF of the post.
Reading IS FUNDAMENTAL.

[billbears]

I thought you'd know it since you support Sadman.

LOL!! There you go again, calling names. But what else should I expect? I don't support Hussein but I also don't support empire and the neverending war cause that refuses to go after the actual culprits

As for the first half of your post I did read it. But I thought we as conservatives didn't support the UN. Or is it just when it suits our needs we bow to their 'all knowing wisdom'. Forget our own intelligence that tells us different. The UN, the whipping post of conservatives for decades, finally produces a document that condones a warhawks position instead of condemning it, so therefore it must be true...

[billbears]

But alas I see you're playing the dutiful liberal game, ignoring the original question choosing instead to go off on a tangent. So the question is put to you. Because Clinton lied to get the Armed Forces of these United States into a war, does that condone President Bush doing the same?