To: Darksheare
I thought you'd know it since you support Sadman.LOL!! There you go again, calling names. But what else should I expect? I don't support Hussein but I also don't support empire and the neverending war cause that refuses to go after the actual culprits
As for the first half of your post I did read it. But I thought we as conservatives didn't support the UN. Or is it just when it suits our needs we bow to their 'all knowing wisdom'. Forget our own intelligence that tells us different. The UN, the whipping post of conservatives for decades, finally produces a document that condones a warhawks position instead of condemning it, so therefore it must be true...
78 posted on
07/22/2003 9:23:18 AM PDT by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: billbears
NAME CALLING?
You support him in everything you say.'
You prove it in every post.
And what part of that post did you not understand?
There were still several tons of chemical weapons left over after Desert Storm.
Some were stored in a warehouse and monitored with equipment.
THIS IS DOCUMENTED and HANS BLIX DID MENTION IT.
The inspectors were kicked out, and tehy left the chem weapons and the momnitoring equipment behind.
Fast forward a couple years.
The inspectors are back, and doing their bumbling oaf act.
The first place they go to is where the chem weapons and monitoring equipment HAD BEEN.
Now, shouldn't that have been there still IF Iraq had been honest?
Guess what, the qeapons AND the monitoring equipment were gone.
AND THOSE WEAPONS ARE STILL UNACCOUNTED FOR.
You're heavily into denial, aren't you.
80 posted on
07/22/2003 9:31:20 AM PDT by
Darksheare
("I didn't say it wouldn't burn, I said it wouldn't hurt.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson