Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New poll shows that Americans oppose gay marriage 60%-33%
The Polling Report ^ | July 21, 2003 | Polling report

Posted on 07/21/2003 1:23:18 PM PDT by No Dems 2004

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: TonyRo76
Don't worry, my friend. You don't need to convince me about the sanctity of man-woman marriage.

I just hope that steam picks up for the FMA, or that something else will prohibit from happening here what is happening in Canada. The fact that most Canadians endorse the notion of homosexual marriage is central to what's causing it to happen. The fact that Americans oppose homosexual marriage by a nearly 2-1 margin will definitely slow down the foul process in the United States. Let's hope that it stops the process completely.

God save America!
42 posted on 07/23/2003 12:03:55 PM PDT by No Dems 2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
Isn't that from Matthew 19?
43 posted on 07/23/2003 12:56:14 PM PDT by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
1 Corinthians Ch.6 Vv 9,10
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.

44 posted on 07/23/2003 1:16:19 PM PDT by azhenfud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: laweeks
"They're winning."

They might get their way for a time. Then the Lord will return.

45 posted on 07/23/2003 2:01:13 PM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
"Man = male + female (Gen 1:27)"

What does that have to do with the discussion of marriage in Genesis? Clearly, Genesis defines marriage as between a male and a female.

46 posted on 07/23/2003 2:02:08 PM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: T'laren
"Getting the breaks that hetero couples get with marraige".

What 'breaks'?

47 posted on 07/23/2003 2:03:01 PM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
"the home in which they live is not reassessed at the current market value which would lead to a sometimes-massive increase in property taxes."

I've never heard of this. At the death of a spouse (or anyone else in the family), the value of the home is not reassessed for property tax purposes. It might be assessed for purposes of 'inheritance taxing' but that's a different issue and would always be assessed at current value.

48 posted on 07/23/2003 2:06:48 PM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: breakem
"I say if you're opposed to gay marraige, don't marry one. Simple."

I say if you are opposed to murder, don't kill someone.

Yeah, I know, you are going to argue "You can't compare homosexual marriage and murder."

But that's not the point. I'm shedding light on your fallacy in reasoning. By following your 'logic' to its conclusion, we would just do away with all laws and people could do anything and everything they felt like, including murder.

If that's not what you want, then your statement didn't make any sense.

49 posted on 07/23/2003 2:11:29 PM PDT by MEGoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
"Man = male + female (Gen 1:27)"

What does that have to do with the discussion of marriage in Genesis? Clearly, Genesis defines marriage as between a male and a female.

Not sure what your question is, but, I was pointing out that in the eyes of God, "Man" is made up of two components: a "male" and a "female." "Man" is complete when there are one of each. "Man" was never intended to be "male" and "male," or "female" and "female." Only as the "two become one flesh" is the design of God made complete.

50 posted on 07/23/2003 2:24:31 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: T'laren
I think it's all about fair play down the middle, but that's just my opinion.

That is really a naive assessment. Their agenda is to overturn what "is" for what they think "ought" should be. They are not looking for a few "bennies," they are looking for universal acceptance for their lifestyle...down to the youngest children. Their agenda is not benign, it aims at nothing less than the overturning of the "traditional" style of life in the US. Don't kid yourself.

51 posted on 07/23/2003 2:31:05 PM PDT by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
Correct - my point was that if one partner of a same-sex couple dies, the house IS reassessed, unlike with a married couple.

There's also a number of insurance coverage issues that arise.
52 posted on 07/23/2003 3:49:37 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: MEGoody
If you follow my logic, you wouldn't come to the conclusions you reached.
53 posted on 07/23/2003 4:28:33 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: azhenfud
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. I have a typo for sure.
The passage is from Matthew 19:4-6. Thank you.

Cindy
54 posted on 07/24/2003 2:11:20 AM PDT by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

Comment #55 Removed by Moderator

Comment #56 Removed by Moderator

To: Im Your Huckleberry
Personally, I think the sodomites should still be living in a world where homosexuality is categorized as a mental illness and where the act of sodomy was a criminal offense.

Then they could be thrown into mental insitutions like they used to be; straightjackets, padded cells, and heavy doses of anti-psychotics administered under the supervision of trained medical personnel.

To keep from being jailed or hospitalized, they would stay in the closet and out of sight.

That's the way it should be. Then we wouldn't be listening to this shrill cacophony of filth from this tiny, degenerate, minority whose positions in the entertainment and media worlds gives them a soap box that lets them project their agenda into society with a far greater signal-to-noise ratio than their insignificant percentage of the population is actually due.

That's the sickest thing I've ever heard in my life. If you want sodomy outlawed, fine and good (although it might be another debate). However, the very idea of using medicine as a deterrent is absolutely abhorent. Sick, sick, sick, sick.

Prisons and jails serve to deter. Hospitals are for the care of the infirm, mentally or physically. Key word there being care.

57 posted on 07/28/2003 5:21:53 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Melas
Until the 1970's, Homosexuality was categorized as a mental illness by the Psychiatric community. It was the lobbying by the sodomites that got them to remove it. Just like the sodomites and pedophiles are now trying to get them to remove pedophelia from the categorized "mental illnesses" - the first step in their attempt to bring legitimacy to that, too.

I think the sodomites do belong in psychiatric wards instead of prisons. They're not criminals, they're deviants. There's a difference. They're mentally ill, in my opinion.

58 posted on 07/28/2003 6:06:41 PM PDT by Im Your Huckleberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson