Skip to comments.
North Korea wants non-aggression pact with US
Radio Netherlands ^
| July 21 2003
Posted on 07/21/2003 12:33:23 PM PDT by knighthawk
North Korea says it wants a non-aggression pact with the United States in exchange for concessions on its own nuclear programme. The Stalinist government in Pyongyang claims this will open the way to arms limitation negotiations.
South Korean newspaper the Korea Times reports that North Korea, the United States and China will probably meet in Beijing on September 6th for talks on the crisis. However, the South Korean government says it knows nothing about any such agreement.
South Korean President Roh Moo-Hyun has denied reports in the US press about a second nuclear reactor in North Korea. At the weekend, the New York Times said measurements taken along the border between the two Koreas suggested a second plant for highly radioactive material was in use in the North. President Roh said the reports were "vague and unfounded".
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nonaggression; northkorea; pact
To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; Squantos; ...
Ping
2
posted on
07/21/2003 12:33:46 PM PDT
by
knighthawk
(We all want to touch a rainbow, but singers and songs will never change it alone. We are calling you)
To: knighthawk
How about "no".
Instead, you can go ahead and dismantle your nuclear program post haste, to ensure that we don't fire off another regime change.
3
posted on
07/21/2003 12:36:43 PM PDT
by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: knighthawk
Hahahaha.......we should agree to some non-aggression pact with this guy and his turdpile country? We shouldn't ever negotiate anything with him. Clinton and Carter did enough damage with the great deal they cut with him.
To: SunStar
exactly...starve em out via a blockade or take em out with tactical nukes...No unilateral talks. If China and the UN don't care, then we better not cave in, but rather, take em out.
5
posted on
07/21/2003 12:46:10 PM PDT
by
jonalvy44
To: knighthawk
What Bush's response should be:
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
My response would be "Go suck a lemon."
7
posted on
07/21/2003 1:35:26 PM PDT
by
Chewbacca
(UAF Nanooks rifle team rules! Best in the nation.)
To: knighthawk
US response: What happened to the last "non aggression" treaty? Oh yeah, you broke that.
8
posted on
07/21/2003 1:58:53 PM PDT
by
rudypoot
(99% of the lawyers make the rest look bad.)
To: knighthawk
The JucheFruit get fruitier.
9
posted on
07/21/2003 3:21:53 PM PDT
by
gcruse
(There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women[.] --Margaret Thatcher)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson