"There is no reason in the world for a woman who screams rape after sleeping with a celebrity to have anonymity. The media should expose this charletan, instead of giving her the P.R. advantage. They are smearing a celebrity simply because of his celebrity. And while I know little of this case, I am aware of the doctrine that a person is innocent until proven guilty."
For someone who "know(s) little of this case" you sure seem to have made your mind up. So explain exactly how you already know she's charletan?
BTW, I agree Bryant's innocent until proven guilty, but you've already assumed the woman is guilty. That's exactly why her name is public -- people who love Bryant will harrass her to no end.
For someone who "know(s) little of this case" you sure seem to have made your mind up. So explain exactly how you already know she's charletan? Because she's making the worst possible allegations, yet sitting behind a veil of media secrecy. To me, this is a sucker-punch tactic.
BTW, I agree Bryant's innocent until proven guilty, but you've already assumed the woman is guilty. That's exactly why her name is public -- people who love Bryant will harrass her to no end.
I don't know anything about Kobe Bryant, nor do I even watch or follow sports.
However, while the media assume that Kobe Bryant is guilty based on an anonymous person's allegation, without presenting any evidence to the public, I find no reason why I should support her.
And by the way, she isn't "innocent until proven guilty", Kobe Bryant is. She is the one making the allegations, and the burden of proof is on her. (While we sit here without even knowing who she is.)
#1 - Dr. J - child
#2 - Bill Cosby - child
#3 - Magic Johnson - AIDS
#4 - Jesse Jackson - child
#5 - Bill Clinton - empeached
#6 - Mike Tyson - prison for rape conviction
#7 - Mike Tyson - current rape charge
#8 - Kobe Bryant - charged with rape
"Celebrities" that don't need condums