Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon plans draft of medics
The Charlotte Observer ^ | Fri, Mar. 21, 2003 | MARK LIBBON

Posted on 07/21/2003 9:42:25 AM PDT by huck von finn

WASHINGTON - The Pentagon is firming up a plan to draft thousands of doctors, nurses and other health-care specialists in the event of a worst-case crisis.

The Selective Service System is dusting off its plan for a "health care personnel delivery system," which has been on the shelf since Congress authorized it in 1987 to cope with military casualties from a large-scale biological or chemical attack.

At the Pentagon's direction, the agency also is examining whether that plan for a "special skills" draft could be adapted to address critical shortages that might arise for military linguists, computer experts or engineers.

"We're going to elevate that kind of draft to be a priority," Lewis Brodsky, acting director of Selective Service, says.

The plan would be needed if an attack on U.S. troops overwhelmed the capabilities of the military to care for its wounded.

The president would issue a proclamation ordering an estimated 3.5 million health-care workers to register for a draft within 13 days. Congress would quickly enact legislation authorizing the draft for health-care workers 20 to 44. For the first time, a draft would include women.

The Pentagon would tell Selective Service how many people it needed in each of 62 specialties. A separate draft lottery would be held for each of those needs.

For example, if 300 orthopedic surgeons were required, Selective Service would choose birthdays in a random lottery and order those dates from 1 to 365. Notices would go out to the surgeons, starting with the first birthday drawn, until 300 had been called.

The Pentagon expects that within several months of the crisis, Selective Service could deliver surgeons, nurses, dentists, X-ray technicians, etc. -- up to an estimated 80,000 in all -- through the Military Entrance Processing Command.

The plan isn't very well-known within the medical community.

"If you were to ask 10 doctors, maybe one might have heard something about it," said Dr. Marybeth McCall, chief medical officer at Crouse Hospital in Syracuse, N.Y., and an Air Force veteran.

McCall said she was confident that health professionals would volunteer their services in the event of a large-scale emergency, much as they did during Operation Desert Storm and the Sept. 11 attacks.

"I would say it would be ill-advised to force a draft," she said. "Health-care personnel commit to a life of service. We're going to take care of patients wherever they happen to be."

Congress ordered up the plan in the late 1980s, thinking more about Cold War dangers than about an Iraqi dictator who might unleash weapons of mass destruction against U.S. troops. Pentagon officials say they see no need for a conventional draft of young men to be soldiers.

Brodsky said the plan has moved to the front burner because of recent signals from the Pentagon and conversations with military leaders.

Selective Service maintains 2,000 active draft boards around the country that would handle appeals for exemptions, deferments and postponements.

Members of those draft boards can expect to be trained in the near future on a special "essentiality" exemption that health-care workers might seek, Flahavan said. A doctor might be able to show, for example, that he or she is essential to a community and should not be drafted.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: draft; medics; pentagon; selectiveservice
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last
To: Cate
This might be just a precaution. The article makes it sound that way. There's probably no reason to assume that the draft will spread to other areas--it's only the areas mentioned so far.
21 posted on 07/21/2003 10:09:47 AM PDT by huck von finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: huck von finn
Looks like they've had big plans for a draft for awhile..
22 posted on 07/21/2003 10:10:11 AM PDT by Bella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
AMENDMENT XIII

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Interesting .... I'm sure it could be argued that the draft is slavery, but I wonder what else could ? .... alimony perhaps ?

23 posted on 07/21/2003 10:11:35 AM PDT by Centurion2000 (We are crushing our enemies, seeing him driven before us and hearing the lamentations of the liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: PenguinWry
It depends on what you mean by "against conscription." Do you mean refusing to serve when ordered--that is, draft dodging?
24 posted on 07/21/2003 10:14:40 AM PDT by huck von finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Bella
Looks like they've had big plans for a draft for awhile..

? What makes you think so? From what's in the article, this looks like a recent decision.

25 posted on 07/21/2003 10:17:56 AM PDT by huck von finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: huck von finn
Looks like they've had big plans for a draft for awhile.. ? What makes you think so? From what's in the article, this looks like a recent decision.

Much to do abount nothing. The pentagon has thousands of people with nothing to do but to plan. So the make plans, and then they remake plans, and then they remake plans, and it goes on and on.

27 posted on 07/21/2003 10:41:02 AM PDT by org.whodat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cate
There are lots of fun anatomical/medical words. When I was growing up we had a model of a human skull. We named him Oss.
28 posted on 07/21/2003 10:42:53 AM PDT by huck von finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
See my post #21...I tend to agree.
29 posted on 07/21/2003 10:44:29 AM PDT by huck von finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: huck von finn
Better the model than your first born... :)
30 posted on 07/21/2003 10:45:32 AM PDT by Cate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PenguinWry
Well, one is legal and the other is not. It appears that our government allows people to express their opinions, but not to shirk duty when ordered. That's probably for the best, because while some people might criticize conscription at one point, others might criticize it at some other point. So our First Amendment remains intact, but when ordered to go, we must go.
31 posted on 07/21/2003 10:49:06 AM PDT by huck von finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: huck von finn
casualties from a large-scale biological or chemical attack.

My first thought was not for military, but for civilians. SARS will be back in the fall......

32 posted on 07/21/2003 10:52:21 AM PDT by myprecious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
Ammendment XIII didn't slow 'em down even a little bit in the past when we used the draft. Not even a little bit.
33 posted on 07/21/2003 10:53:51 AM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cate
I got out of the Air force in July of 1990, right before Desert Shield. As an ER doc with flying experience (flight surgeon for an F-4 squadron tasked for the Middle East as part of the old Rapid Deployment Force) I was pretty anxious. Called my old residency director ( who was the Army advisor on ER medicine, I trained at an Army Hospital ) and asked him what the deal was. His reply:

"Well if it gets ugly, there will be a bill through Congress in 1 day and it will be signed by the President by nightfall. The first planes going over will be full of Active duty folks, the next load will be Guard and Reserve, you can expect to be on the third, as prior service after that it will be the new draftees"....

So this ain't exactly a surprise. At 47 I am getting a litttle long in the tooth.
34 posted on 07/21/2003 10:56:09 AM PDT by Kozak (" No mans life liberty or property is safe when the legislature is in session." Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: myprecious
Well that's certainly a thought. I hadn't thought about that at all.
35 posted on 07/21/2003 10:58:04 AM PDT by huck von finn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Bisesi
Get ready CANADA, you are about to experience an INFLUX of immigrants from the US Medical community.

Hell I would rather serve again rather then have to work as a slave in the Canadian system.
36 posted on 07/21/2003 10:59:54 AM PDT by Kozak (" No mans life liberty or property is safe when the legislature is in session." Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cate
Are Health Care Professionals Subject to the Draft?

Questions and Answers About The Health Care Personnel Delivery System



In response to Department of Defense concerns about potential shortfalls of health care personnel, legislation was introduced in 1987 to register medical specialists. That legislation was soon replaced with instructions for Selective Service to design a Health Care Personnel Delivery System, PL 100-180, which amended the Military Selective Service Act in December 1987.

The Health Care Personnel Delivery System (HCPDS) would be an annex to the regular conscription system under the Military Selective Service Act. It is a very different proposal from the Doctors' Draft, which expired in 1973.

Selective Service first published the first HCPDS concept paper in August 1989. That proposal has now been reissued in greater detail and with a few changes reflecting the critique Selective Service received in 1989. The concept paper is not yet law, though changes in the proposal are not likely without strong leadership from the medical community.

There is no draft operating now. Although the statute and regulations for a draft are in place, the President's induction authority expired in July 1973. The only part of a draft which is currently operating is draft registration, which is required of young men between the ages of 18-25.

At this time, Selective Service has no statutory authority to draft medical personnel. That authorization would be provided by legislation to be introduced and passed in Congress at the time of a national defense mobilization. That "M-Day" legislative package has not been made available for public comment or Congressional debate.





Can Selective Service start registering and drafting at any time?

No. The proposal is not yet law. It would require authorizing legislation, as well as implementing regulations. Selective Service says it will be kept "on the shelf" to be implemented when needed.

Are all medical personnel vulnerable?

Yes. The Health Care Professionals Delivery System would register and conscript sixty-two categories of medical specialists. They range from orthopedic surgeons to animal care technicians—doctors, nurses, medical specialists of all types.

Can I be drafted if I am fifty years old?

Yes. In this concept, Selective Service projects taking people through age 55.

Are students in the health care professions subject to the draft?

When students complete their qualification for their specialty, they will be required to register and will be subject to this medical specialists draft. In the meantime, if they are subject to the regular draft they could be inducted or deferred under the regulations already in place.

Are women included?

Yes. Selective Service proposes that women be included, since the service they provide is non-combatant. The current exclusion of women from the draft would be amended in the statute.

How likely is it that this proposal will ever be implemented?

It depends on how long and how big a war is, and how many casualties are predicted or eventuate. CCW believes that medical specialists will be called well before they ever get around to a general draft. During the Gulf War, health care specialists in the reserves were mobilized first, along with the logistics personnel who got them in place.

If I am registered for the draft already, will I need to register again as a medical specialist?

Yes. The separate register of Health Care Professionals will supersede the other registration. You will be required to provide information about the highest skill level in the health care professions that you have attained. You will still be subject to the regular draft, though you will almost certainly be beyond the age for call-up in the prime selection group of men who turn twenty in the calendar year.

Will there be deferments and exemptions?

As in the regular draft, there will be deferments, but the physical standards for acceptance will be lower.

Who decides who goes?

Selective Service System local draft boards and administrative offices staffed by reservists will decide all claims for postponements, deferments, and exemptions. Physicians’ claims that they are "essential" to their community will be evaluated by advisory boards.

Will there be provisions for conscientious objectors?

The same criteria for conscientious objectors would apply as in the regular draft.

Do conscientious objectors have to be wary of particular problems for health care professionals?

Potential applicants need to be alerted to the fact that during the Gulf War it was especially difficult to gain approval for CO claims by military doctors.

Will alternative service be required of conscientious objectors?

Yes, but the alternative service program for medical personnel is not defined yet. Selective Service says it needs to monitor it more closely than the regular alternative service program, but does not explain what this close monitoring would entail. Selective Service intends to reassign health care COs to fields in which there is a short supply of health care givers. Health care specialists should be aware that they will probably have a right to present their own proposal for the work they would do in alternative service.

What other problems are there with the proposed system?

There are many:

It is unfair that male health care personnel will be subject to liability under both conscription systems.
The proposal does not explain how adequate public notice of the requirements of the system will be given.
The proposal is too vague regarding which occupational deferments will be allowed. Without detail, a proper assessment cannot be made.
Similarly, not enough is said about how SSS will register the various specialties and then respond to DoD calls by particular specialty. The differential rates for differing specialties, combined with random sequence selection, and youngest first requirements implicit in the regular draft, do not seem to be resolved.
Selective Service says it cannot meet the worst-case scenario proposed by DoD. CCW has some sympathy with this view, since it is predicated on all-out nuclear war.
The system is a "mobilization style" draft, which CCW believes to have no statutory authority. Since Congress has explicitly rejected such a system, legal challenges on this basis can be expected.
CCW does not see the need for lower physical standards for health care personnel, as if their service would be any less vigorous and less demanding than that which other draftees would have to undergo.
SSS claims to have coordinated the proposal with other government agencies, though this cannot have been done with the officials in the present administration.
Is my professional association fully aware of this proposal?

SSS is misleading in claiming to have consulted with the affected professions. As in 1989, CCW does not believe that this has been done sufficiently nor with sufficient publicity to allow proper consultation.

Write to your association and ask for its analysis and position on the HCPDS.

What next steps should be considered?

The proposal should not be kept on the shelf, to be included with the special legislation authorizing U.S. participation in hostilities. Instead, this proposal should be discussed by the public and by the affected professions, and hearings should be held in Congress to determine whether or not such a conscription system is necessary.
37 posted on 07/21/2003 11:01:07 AM PDT by US admirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Polycarp
I'm hoping Podiatry ain't one of them...not highly likely regardless.

Not likely? You don't think the Infantry and Marines walk anymore? :-)
38 posted on 07/21/2003 11:05:41 AM PDT by Kozak (" No mans life liberty or property is safe when the legislature is in session." Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: huck von finn
I just remember talking to several nurses back when the reality of SARS was really sinking in. Every one of them admitted they would quit rather than risk catching it and exposing their families if things got bad.
39 posted on 07/21/2003 11:06:30 AM PDT by myprecious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Centurion2000
The Supreme Court has ruled (more than once, I believe) that conscription is *not* involuntary servitude.

First World War, I believe.

40 posted on 07/21/2003 11:08:01 AM PDT by George Smiley (Is the RKBA still a right if you have to get the government's permission before you can exercise it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson