Skip to comments.
France Insists Saddam Has Never Bought Uranium
Independent (UK) ^
| 7-21-2003
| Kim Sengupta
Posted on 07/20/2003 4:19:33 PM PDT by blam
France insists Saddam has never bought uranium
By Kim Sengupta
21 July 2003
The British Government's claim that Saddam Hussein had sought to buy uranium from Niger has been dismissed by the French ambassador to the central African state.
In another blow to the credibility of the Blair Government over the issue, Denis Vène said it was impossible for uranium to leave the country without French officials knowing.
France has a substantial stake in the two companies that mine, process and export uranium, and its movement is "perfectly controlled". The ambassador told The Sunday Telegraph: "The mining companies check and monitor the amounts that leave Niger all the way from the mines to the ports. If any were to go missing, it would be very obvious and the inspectors would pick it up straight away."
British government sources had claimed that French intelligence supplied London with details of Iraqi uranium purchases. But this has been vehemently denied by Paris.
M. Vène was backed by Rabiou Hassanne Yari, Niger's Minister of Mines, who told The Independent on Sunday that he was "sure and certain" that his country had never sold uranium to Iraq.
Of Mr Blair's claim that 270 tons had been purchased in the 1980s, he said: "It's not true. The Iraqis asked, but there was never any transactions."
He added that the request was not a secret. It was "officially made and officially turned down". He pointed out that Niger's uranium production was subject to scrutiny by the International Atomic Energy Agency.
Britain had maintained that the "purchase" of the uranium in the 1980s made it likely that Iraq went back for more.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: france; sadda; uranium
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
1
posted on
07/20/2003 4:19:33 PM PDT
by
blam
To: blam; William McKinley; seamole; cyncooper
And now France joins the fray..
2
posted on
07/20/2003 4:25:46 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: blam
In another blow to the credibility of the Blair Government over the issue, Denis Vène said it was impossible for uranium to leave the country without French officials knowing. If true, all this proves is that French officials knew about it.
To: blam
They're probably right. It was never sold - traded for Iraqi oil perhaps, but never, never sold (insert picture of CLinton - whoops, Chiraq wagging finger here).
4
posted on
07/20/2003 4:27:27 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: Miss Marple
Of Mr Blair's claim that 270 tons had been purchased in the 1980s, he said: "It's not true. The Iraqis asked, but there was never any transactions." The French government just called Blair a liar.
5
posted on
07/20/2003 4:27:51 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: blam
"France has a substantial stake in the two companies that mine, process and export uranium, and its movement is "perfectly controlled""
Whoah whoah.. Sounds like China's talking early on with SARS.. 'It's all perfect here' crap.
6
posted on
07/20/2003 4:28:20 PM PDT
by
Monty22
To: blam
"Denis Vène said it was impossible for uranium to leave the country without French officials knowing. "
The French stink and so do their cover-ups
To: Dog
It never being sold is not incompatible with the idea that they tried to buy it.
I have not won the lottery. I have tried to win the lottery.
8
posted on
07/20/2003 4:28:48 PM PDT
by
William McKinley
(You're so vain, you probably think this tagline's about you)
To: Howlin; Mo1
fyi..
9
posted on
07/20/2003 4:29:21 PM PDT
by
Dog
To: Bubba_Leroy
Notice the assumption in the article that the French are telling the truth.
What happened to that storied press cynicism?
10
posted on
07/20/2003 4:30:04 PM PDT
by
zarf
(fuggetaboutit)
To: Dog
These liberals are something else. Seems to me the debate was whether or not Saddam was "trying" to buy the yellow cake not that he actually did. Then again what was the radio active material that the Iraqi's looted and everyone was so concerned about? Parley
To: blam
Seeking to buy uranium is completely different than actually buying it.
GW and Blair have both stated that Saddam "sought to buy uranium".
They never inferred that there was an actual completion of any transaction.
The article states that he was refused, thus does not run counter to their statements.
Am I missing something here?
12
posted on
07/20/2003 4:33:49 PM PDT
by
spoiler2
To: Bubba_Leroy
LOL! Good point.
13
posted on
07/20/2003 4:36:18 PM PDT
by
TheDon
(Why do liberals always side with the enemies of the US?)
To: ThreePuttinDude
"Denis Vène said it was impossible for uranium to leave the country without French officials knowing. "Ferme la bouche. Eat some cheese and put your hands up...NOW!
FMCDH
14
posted on
07/20/2003 4:37:12 PM PDT
by
nothingnew
(the pendulum swings and the libs are in the pit)
To: spoiler2
What you are missing is the anti-Bush transmogrifier, which makes any tangential statement proof that Blair and Bush were lying.
Actually, no, you are not missing anything, just as William McKinley isn't. They are spinning.
To: Dog
Let me see .. who am I going believe ...
Hmmmmmm France and Saddam or The US and Britain?
16
posted on
07/20/2003 4:38:45 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
To: blam
Simple answer: Any sample of Uranium will contain impurities. The types and amounts of impurities can be spectrographically analysed. It's like fingerprinting.
We should immediately check for the Nigerian Uranium fingerprint in the stockpiles we have seized in Iraq.
To: spoiler2
18
posted on
07/20/2003 4:39:33 PM PDT
by
nothingnew
(the pendulum swings and the libs are in the pit)
To: blam
hey france, try and prove a negative, you nitwits...
19
posted on
07/20/2003 4:43:39 PM PDT
by
isom35
To: mfulstone
We should immediately check for the Nigerian Uranium fingerprint in the stockpiles we have seized in Iraq BINGO!
20
posted on
07/20/2003 4:44:05 PM PDT
by
Mo1
(Please help Free Republic and Donate Now !!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson