Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCO readies new Linux licensing program
IDG News Service ^ | July 18, 2003 | Robert McMillan

Posted on 07/19/2003 6:36:21 PM PDT by amigatec

SCO readies new Linux licensing program Users would get access to OS without fear of litigation

By Robert McMillan, IDG News Service July 18, 2003

The SCO Group is preparing a new Linux licensing program that it claims will allow users of the open-source operating system to run Linux without fear of litigation.

The program will be announced "within the next month or so," according to SCO spokesman Blake Stowell, but on Monday the company will announce what he calls a "precursor" to this program in a press conference with SCO Chief Executive Officer Darl McBride and SCO's high-profile attorney David Boies, of the firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner.

In March, SCO launched a $1 billion lawsuit against IBM, charging Big Blue with breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets. At the heart of SCO's complaint are allegations that IBM attempted to destroy the economic value of Unix in order to benefit its Linux services business, and that it inappropriately contributed source code to the Linux kernel.

Since then, SCO has warned Linux users that they could be held liable for inappropriately using SCO's intellectual property and boosted its claim for damages against IBM to more than $3 billion. In June the Lindon, Utah, company announced that it had terminated IBM's Unix license, originally obtained in 1985 from AT&T, but subsequently transferred to SCO.

IBM has denied any wrongdoing in the matter.

Stowell declined to provide specific details of SCO's new licensing program, saying only, "we're working on some details to try and create some kind of a licensing program for Linux users to be able to run Linux legally."

Monday's press conference, which will be conducted by telephone, will occur at 12 p.m. EDT.

A statement announcing the event said that SCO executives will provide details on "opportunities for Linux customers." That does not bode well for Linux users, according to one analyst. "Opportunities for Linux customers jumped out at me," said Illuminata. analyst Gordon Haff. "Opportunities are rarely good news."

While the majority of Linux customers probably would not participate in a SCO licensing program, Haff predicted some companies might be willing to pay SCO for the security of knowing they would not be sued. SCO is "hoping that even if 99 percent of Linux customers laugh in their face, that there will be sufficient large companies who, for what is presumably going to be a relative drop in the bucket of their IT budgets, can potentially eliminate a cloud over their heads," he said.

Lawyers following the lawsuit say that Monday's press conference will be interesting simply because it marks David Boies's first public appearance in connection with the case since being hired by SCO in January.

Boies is widely known for his work in a string of high-profile cases including Al Gore's unsuccessful challenge of the 2000 federal election results in Florida, and the U.S. Department of Justice's antitrust suit against Microsoft.. His appearance on Monday's teleconference is likely to inject a level of showmanship into the case, said Lawrence Rosen, a partner with Rosenlaw & Einschlag, and a general counsel for the Open Source Initiative, an open-source advocacy group.

"In every generation, there are attorneys who rise to a certain level of performance," said Rosen. "David Boies is that kind of an attorney," he said. "If I hired David Boies to do something, I would expect a courtroom performance and possibly a standing-in-front-of-a-microphone performance in which he earns his money," he said.

Another attorney who has been following the case agreed that Boies's comments would be likely to raise the profile of the already high-profile case. "I suspect that this is an attempt to stir things up," said Jeffrey Neuburger, a partner with Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner. "David Boies is clearly somebody who attracts attention. He'll probably say some interesting or controversial things."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: darlmcbride; ibm; lawsuit; linux; microsoft; ms; sco; unix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: Bush2000
Microsoft won.

Technically, perhaps. For most intents and purposes, no.

41 posted on 07/21/2003 8:48:26 PM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Please show me the offending code.

Hint: It's here: http://kernel.org/
42 posted on 07/23/2003 1:50:44 PM PDT by adam_az (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
>I bet SCO makes a lot of money with this STUPID idea!!
>>I doubt it. At least not until they publicly show something vaguely resembling evidence of their claims.

Are you kidding? SCO stock is up about 40% in the few days since scox started this scam. Since scox started the bogus ibm lawsuit scox stock is up about 750% not bad for a tiny company that has been *gushing* red ink since day one. Scox has a book value around $10 million and loses between $25 million and $125 million every year. Scox was trading way below $1 a share a few months ago, now scox is trading around $15 a share. Insiders are selling like mad. Insider also had the forsight to give themselves hundreds of thousands of options for $0.001 each.

Still doubt that Scox is making money?
43 posted on 07/24/2003 8:54:52 AM PDT by walterbyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
>>IBM is going to have a hard time explaining why matching code and comments from AT&T Unix appear in Linux <<

The lawsuit isn't about code. That is just a PR stunt. Anyway, the matching code was 20 year old stuff.

>>It appears to be a case of IBM not understanding the terms of its AIX license <<

IBM must have a really stupid legal department, right? This couldn't just be a case of scox making a lot a noise so stock price goes from $1 to $15, and the insiders cash in, right? Why do you think IBM declined to buy SCO when sco was $1 a share, guess IBM is really stupid.

>>Even if SCO becomes nothing more than a shell corporation, it has enormous value based on the the value of its IP assets. <<

Debatable. SCO owns old old UNIX. With Linux and FreeBSD taking over, the value of that IP is diminishing. Besides, practically everybody that would want a linux license has already bought one - long ago. Why do think sco has never had a profitable year?
44 posted on 07/24/2003 9:48:00 AM PDT by walterbyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
Scox going after end-users is also dubious and unprecedented. I know of serveral IP conflicts between software companies: apple v microsoft, xerox v apple, stacker v microsoft, lotus v borland. But, I have never heard of the complaining company going after end-users.

If I buy a newspaper, and there is a plagerized story in it, it's not my fault - I can't be held responsible. Similarly, if there is some illegal code in my OS, it's not my fault.
45 posted on 07/24/2003 9:53:42 AM PDT by walterbyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: walterbyrd
Scox was trading way below $1 a share a few months ago, now scox is trading around $15 a share. Insiders are selling like mad. Insider also had the forsight to give themselves hundreds of thousands of options for $0.001 each. Still doubt that Scox is making money?

The insiders are making money, sure. By all appearances it's a pump-and-dump scheme, and if it ends the way I expect it to (SCO getting smashed into oblivion by IBM), I hope the SEC takes a good look at those trades.

46 posted on 07/24/2003 7:14:48 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson