Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCO readies new Linux licensing program
IDG News Service ^ | July 18, 2003 | Robert McMillan

Posted on 07/19/2003 6:36:21 PM PDT by amigatec

SCO readies new Linux licensing program Users would get access to OS without fear of litigation

By Robert McMillan, IDG News Service July 18, 2003

The SCO Group is preparing a new Linux licensing program that it claims will allow users of the open-source operating system to run Linux without fear of litigation.

The program will be announced "within the next month or so," according to SCO spokesman Blake Stowell, but on Monday the company will announce what he calls a "precursor" to this program in a press conference with SCO Chief Executive Officer Darl McBride and SCO's high-profile attorney David Boies, of the firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner.

In March, SCO launched a $1 billion lawsuit against IBM, charging Big Blue with breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets. At the heart of SCO's complaint are allegations that IBM attempted to destroy the economic value of Unix in order to benefit its Linux services business, and that it inappropriately contributed source code to the Linux kernel.

Since then, SCO has warned Linux users that they could be held liable for inappropriately using SCO's intellectual property and boosted its claim for damages against IBM to more than $3 billion. In June the Lindon, Utah, company announced that it had terminated IBM's Unix license, originally obtained in 1985 from AT&T, but subsequently transferred to SCO.

IBM has denied any wrongdoing in the matter.

Stowell declined to provide specific details of SCO's new licensing program, saying only, "we're working on some details to try and create some kind of a licensing program for Linux users to be able to run Linux legally."

Monday's press conference, which will be conducted by telephone, will occur at 12 p.m. EDT.

A statement announcing the event said that SCO executives will provide details on "opportunities for Linux customers." That does not bode well for Linux users, according to one analyst. "Opportunities for Linux customers jumped out at me," said Illuminata. analyst Gordon Haff. "Opportunities are rarely good news."

While the majority of Linux customers probably would not participate in a SCO licensing program, Haff predicted some companies might be willing to pay SCO for the security of knowing they would not be sued. SCO is "hoping that even if 99 percent of Linux customers laugh in their face, that there will be sufficient large companies who, for what is presumably going to be a relative drop in the bucket of their IT budgets, can potentially eliminate a cloud over their heads," he said.

Lawyers following the lawsuit say that Monday's press conference will be interesting simply because it marks David Boies's first public appearance in connection with the case since being hired by SCO in January.

Boies is widely known for his work in a string of high-profile cases including Al Gore's unsuccessful challenge of the 2000 federal election results in Florida, and the U.S. Department of Justice's antitrust suit against Microsoft.. His appearance on Monday's teleconference is likely to inject a level of showmanship into the case, said Lawrence Rosen, a partner with Rosenlaw & Einschlag, and a general counsel for the Open Source Initiative, an open-source advocacy group.

"In every generation, there are attorneys who rise to a certain level of performance," said Rosen. "David Boies is that kind of an attorney," he said. "If I hired David Boies to do something, I would expect a courtroom performance and possibly a standing-in-front-of-a-microphone performance in which he earns his money," he said.

Another attorney who has been following the case agreed that Boies's comments would be likely to raise the profile of the already high-profile case. "I suspect that this is an attempt to stir things up," said Jeffrey Neuburger, a partner with Brown Raysman Millstein Felder & Steiner. "David Boies is clearly somebody who attracts attention. He'll probably say some interesting or controversial things."


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: darlmcbride; ibm; lawsuit; linux; microsoft; ms; sco; unix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
I bet SCO makes a lot of money with this STUPID idea!!

But Darl McBride isn't to smart anyway, I guess if you can't sell your crappy product, you cam always claim something that isn't your and charge for it. MS has been stealing from others for years.

1 posted on 07/19/2003 6:36:21 PM PDT by amigatec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Ping the Penguins!!!
2 posted on 07/19/2003 6:37:01 PM PDT by amigatec (There are no significant bugs in our software... Maybe you're not using it properly.- Bill Gates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amigatec
Now look here. That's red meat for Slashdot, and they won't take kindly to you cross posting, especially if you post it here first.
3 posted on 07/19/2003 6:39:55 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amigatec
I bet SCO makes a lot of money with this STUPID idea!!

I doubt it. At least not until they publicly show something vaguely resembling evidence of their claims.

4 posted on 07/19/2003 6:44:35 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amigatec
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Pay for Linux? Never. They can have my hard disk when they pry it from my cold, dead server. I've worked with and on linux since the slackware distro was 5 floppies and minix was the available filesystem.

SCO can embrace that which is behind me.

/john

5 posted on 07/19/2003 6:46:23 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (I'm just a cook.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amigatec
They are starting to read the tea-leaves that tell them:"Forget it!"
6 posted on 07/19/2003 6:50:44 PM PDT by capt. norm (For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amigatec
Actually, this may end up being a successful, if unethical,
strategy.
7 posted on 07/19/2003 6:56:11 PM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Robinson; B Knotts; stainlessbanner; TechJunkYard; ShadowAce; Knitebane; AppyPappy; jae471; ...
The Penguin Ping.

Wanna be Penguified? Just holla!


The Gimp can run on Windows, too. Click to try it now.

Got root?

8 posted on 07/19/2003 7:04:50 PM PDT by rdb3 (Nerve-racking since 0413hrs on XII-XXII-MCMLXXI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: amigatec
Well, I'm so glad to hear that my currently unlicensed Linux box can finally be "legal". I look forward to looking over SCO's licensing terms and then ignoring them because SCO is so clearly full of it.
9 posted on 07/19/2003 7:11:35 PM PDT by Dimensio (Sometimes I doubt your committment to Sparkle Motion!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dimensio
Yes I can hardly wait, I have my checkbook in hand I want to be the first with a brand new SCO license.

Is HELL freezing over yet??
10 posted on 07/19/2003 7:16:26 PM PDT by amigatec (There are no significant bugs in our software... Maybe you're not using it properly.- Bill Gates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Gimps got a really clean (and stable) interface, but the way you do some things on it is kind of odd. I almost wish I had more of a reason to draw pretty pictures with it so that I could use it more. Back when it was new though, it was the big killer open source app going up against the big killer shareware app (paint shop pro) going up against whatever Adobe or Microsoft's offerings were. Microsoft probably does have a point about the harm that open source software poses to the industry as they know it, but that's sort of like the stand the Luddites took a century or two ago. Once drawing programs and fancy web browsers become common place and you've achieved the holy grail of highly portable, highly distributable software, the thing to do is search for another holy grail.
11 posted on 07/19/2003 7:25:58 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: amigatec
The SCO Group is preparing a new Linux licensing program that it claims will allow users of the open-source operating system to run Linux without fear of litigation.

It is time for the courts to move on this nonsense. It's been great fun for the trade journalists, but here we see them selling protection against unproven claims. This is outrageous. It is like a guy waving a gun the street, demanding money from people. This "gun" does not exist, except for the fact that the court has not yet ruled on the validity of SCO's claim that linux contains its property.

That claim is being litigated. For them to solicit money on the basis of that claim, using "more litigation" as a threat, is extortion. And for Boies & Co., it's Barratry.

Let SCO prove its claim that linux contains its property. Then they can ask money for the use of what is rightfully theirs. For now, this is a circus act with the clowns using the court system as a toy. And now they are using their toy to extort money from people. Enough!


12 posted on 07/19/2003 7:32:30 PM PDT by Nick Danger (The liberals are slaughtering themselves at the gates of the newsroom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amigatec
Even if this IP lawsuit BS runs out of steam (and I hope that it will), I think the best penguin zealots can hope for is that Linux continues to nip at Microsoft's heals after 2003 is released, then desktop Linux/GNU/XFree86/FreeBSD will likely have more catching up to do. But that situation is probably the best of both worlds. A large number of people get neatsy-keen graphics and gui features "right now", a smaller clique gets neatsy-keen open source versions of the same a little later. Unfortunately, there will probably still be an even larger number of people who still have dos or windows3.1 on their machines and won't know the difference.
13 posted on 07/19/2003 7:34:56 PM PDT by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amigatec
I think it's time for an FTC complaint against SCO.
14 posted on 07/19/2003 7:42:19 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amigatec
In other news, David Boies has been formally accused of an ethics violation in Florida.
15 posted on 07/19/2003 7:44:54 PM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amigatec
screw_david_b
16 posted on 07/19/2003 7:49:59 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
There are at least 4 stable Linux kernel trees (1.2, 2.0, 2.2, and 2.4).

SCO has not specified which of these infringe.

Does someone running Linux kernel version 1.2.something need to pay SCO for "protection"?

17 posted on 07/19/2003 7:53:28 PM PDT by brianl703
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
I was going to suggest this was an extortion attempt if no one else did.
Luckily, I tend to read all comments first.

Well said, I agree completely.

18 posted on 07/19/2003 10:11:11 PM PDT by Drammach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: amigatec
I bet SCO makes a lot of money with this STUPID idea!!

The Nigerian email scam makes loads of money too. Never underestimate the power of stupid.

19 posted on 07/20/2003 12:00:04 AM PDT by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amigatec
But Darl McBride isn't to smart anyway...

McBride has a lawsuit pending against IBM for $1 billion -- and a reasonable shot of winning. You're posting tripe on a website. Gee... who's smarter...
20 posted on 07/20/2003 2:44:35 AM PDT by Bush2000 (R>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson