Skip to comments.
Blair says weapons expert death a "tragedy", urges calm
Associated Press , Yahoo News ^
| July 19, 2003
| AP
Posted on 07/19/2003 4:55:37 AM PDT by prairiebreeze
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Ironically, this weekend's crisis has its roots in Blair's last week-long journey abroad in late May when he visited British troops in southern Iraq. Nothing ironic about it at all. UK libs use the same tactics as ours do. Strike when the leader is out of the country.
Prairie
To: prairiebreeze
Yes, that's one of their favorite tactics.
I hope Blair's supporters are aggressive about this and point out that the only people who stood to benefit or at least be protected by Kelly's death were Blair's opponents, particularly in the press. I read that on Thursday, Kelly was supposed to turn over a list of the reporters he had spoken to.
That said, it's quite possible that he committed suicide, since it doesn't sound as if he was used to the savage treatment handed out by the press and politicians. I suspect that dealing with WMD is nothing when compared to dealing with a baying pack of politically motivated reporters.
2
posted on
07/19/2003 5:05:41 AM PDT
by
livius
To: livius
Believe I heard that a press conference is expected sometime soon. Somehow I think the press will use their tools to shift responsibility away from themselves. Hope the Brits see through that.
Agree about dealing with WMD vs. politicians. Who wants to be lowered into a pit of rattlesnakes??
Prairie
3
posted on
07/19/2003 5:16:44 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(I'm a monthly donor to FRee Republic. And proud of it!)
To: livius
Not sure I buy the "press" drove him to it. To similiar to the Foster spin.
4
posted on
07/19/2003 5:17:05 AM PDT
by
steve50
(I don't know about being with "us", but I'm with the Constitution)
To: steve50
Considering that Kelly e-mailed a friend within a day or two of his death that he (Kelly) was looking forward to getting back to work in Baghdad, I really doubt Kelly offed himself.
5
posted on
07/19/2003 5:19:36 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: mewzilla
I wonder if this isn't yet another mysterious -circumstance microbiologist death. Won't this make 14 or so in the last couple of years?
Prairie
6
posted on
07/19/2003 5:24:58 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(I'm a monthly donor to FRee Republic. And proud of it!)
To: All
"THE MAN WHO KNEW TOO MUCH".
I hope Kelly left diaries which will help Tony, though I think the issue should have been laid to rest a long time ago.
I'm sure that Hillary is gloating after hearing of Kelly's death. After all, she told Tony that she thought an investigation by the Brits was the right way to go!!
7
posted on
07/19/2003 5:30:52 AM PDT
by
Sacajaweau
(God Bless Our Troops!!)
To: All
Thank you very much! |
Thank you very much! |
That's the nicest thing that anyone's ever done for me. |
It isn't every day |
good fortune comes me way! |
I never thought the future would be fun for me! |
And if I had a bugle |
I would blow it to add a sort |
o' how's your father's touch. |
But since I left me bugle at home |
I simply have to say |
Thank you very, very, very much! |
Thank you very, very, very much! |
Thank you for your donation!
8
posted on
07/19/2003 5:32:19 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: prairiebreeze
I thought the late Mr. Kelly was #13, but who's counting? Blair needs to get to the bottom of this, but I wonder if he's got the stomach for it.
9
posted on
07/19/2003 5:37:00 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: mewzilla
I thought the late Mr. Kelly was #13, but who's counting? Blair needs to get to the bottom of this, but I wonder if he's got the stomach for it.
I wonder if he can keep the investigation confined to the Ministry of Justice, or whatever it's called over there. Not much danger in investigating yourself, as past experience it the US would attest to.
10
posted on
07/19/2003 5:40:48 AM PDT
by
steve50
(I don't know about being with "us", but I'm with the Constitution)
To: steve50
Well, someone needs to get to the bottom of this. What's going on looks like the next best thing to a coup attempt to my mind.
And FWIW, anyone who's interested in a little backround on Andrew Gilligan, who's not even mentioned in the above article interesting enough, can click here for a backround story from the Guardian a couple of days ago.
11
posted on
07/19/2003 5:47:37 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: steve50
If this was a suicide, it certainly came at an inconvenient time, which indicates to me a motivation for a murder.
Who gains by this man's death? Certainly not Blair.
My suspects are the far left in Blair's own party, who would like to unseat him as PM, aided by the left in this country, particularly the Clintons; the BBC and its allies in the print media; and foreign agents, particularly terrorists and/or the French.
To: Miss Marple
This does have a Fosteresque aroma about it, doesn't it?
To: glock rocks
Well, let's just say it's highly suspicious. I don't like to use the Foster name because it tends to point the finger at the Chief Executive (in this case Blair) and because too many moderates will discount any suspicions, having been convinced by the mainstream press that Foster's death was a non-story.
I do not think Blair had anything to do with this. It may indeed have been a suicide, and if so will be easily identified as such by the coroner's inquest.
However, if the results are inconclusive, I remind everyone that Blair does NOT benefit from this death; enemies of Blair and Britain will.
To: glock rocks
Click
here for an article from today's
Telegraph on Kelly and the eight hours before he was found. The aerial pic is interesting. Can't believe the guy walked all the way out there through hedgerows in bad weather to kill himself.
15
posted on
07/19/2003 5:58:09 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: Miss Marple
Who gains by this man's death? Certainly not Blair.
I think you got a bad case of blaming everything on klintoon and the so called left. The real villians are the globalist "New World Order" types, and they cross party/national borders.
Despite his denials, which aren't that uncommon by whistleblowers, I find it likeley he was one source for the information that has 56% of the Brits saying they trust Blair as far as they can throw him.
If foul play is involved the first place to look is the Blair faction.
16
posted on
07/19/2003 5:59:52 AM PDT
by
steve50
(I don't know about being with "us", but I'm with the Constitution)
To: steve50
But why? Gilligan had already been discredited. And Kelly wasn't copping to being Gilligan's source in any case. What did Blair have to gain by Kelly's death?
17
posted on
07/19/2003 6:04:50 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: glock rocks
This does have a Fosteresque aroma about it, doesn't it? Not yet. Decomposition has not yet set in. ;~)
18
posted on
07/19/2003 6:07:44 AM PDT
by
verity
To: prairiebreeze
Soo-ee-cide. Tom Lantos would be pleased.
19
posted on
07/19/2003 6:09:39 AM PDT
by
randita
To: mewzilla
Kelly not admitting he was the source doesn't make it so. In one of his statements at the hearing he said he wasn't the only source that had been talking to Gilligan.
I don't see how the Blair opposition or the press needed him out of the way, to imply the BBC offed him seems desperate to me. Blair has the most to lose from unauthorized disclosure, so that's where any logical inquiry would start.
20
posted on
07/19/2003 6:12:16 AM PDT
by
steve50
(I don't know about being with "us", but I'm with the Constitution)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson