[connectthedots]

Numerous counts of mail fraud, obstruction of justice, and other RICO predicates. Keep in mind that mail fraud is fairly simple to prove and obstruction of justice has only two elemants; a pending matter in a legal action and an attempt to interfer with the due administration of justice. These are two very staight-forward RICO predicates to prove, especially in my case. I have the letters and mailings to proof mail fraud and the obstruction of justice evidence is actually contined in the court records of cases I initiated; in part as an inexpensive discovery tool.

[lugsoul]

Okay, this is more difficult than it should be. My question is simple. What do you contend the judge(s) did wrong, other than rule against you? Did they take money or favors? Did they rule favorably for someone they know? Did they rule in a certain way in order to gain advantage for themselves? Without regard to what charge you think applies, what do you say they did wrong?