Read my previous post. In another related case, I caught a judge committing perjury during a hearing, forced the sheriff to investigate and the sheriff's report pretty much stated that the judge did commit perjury and referred the case to the county prosecutor for prosecution. Even though the judge's name was all over the report, the prosecutor's computerized records indicate that the suspect was "First Name: NONE, Last Name: NONE". I think this is clear evidence of obstruction of justice. The attorney for the other party in that case even admitted to the sheriff that the judge committed perjury. This was part of my RICO action as well. There have been numerous other instances such as this as well. The prosecutor refused to prosecute because if he did so, his participation in the RICO conspiracy would have been exposed. This is only the tip of the iceberg.
Did they take money or favors? Did they rule favorably for someone they know? Did they rule in a certain way in order to gain advantage for themselves? Without regard to what charge you think applies, what do you say they did wrong?
I am not required to prove a judge received a bribe. That I was deprived of my property in violation of 18 USC 1257 is enough. It is also reasonable to infer that a judge would not obstruct justice and commit other crimes if there was not something in it for him/themselves.